1887

Abstract

Summary

For unconventional fields, hydraulic stimulation is affected by different geologic drivers than conventional fields. These unconventional geologic drivers are Natural Fracture Densities, Brittleness, Porosity, and Total Organic Carbon. Combined, these four geologic drivers make Shale Capacity. Shale Capacity has been shown to correlate with well production.

In this Bakken case study, 3D seismic, well logs, and production information are available. 3D seismic is enhanced through a broadband spectral inversion. This enhanced seismic is used for calculating curvature, spectral attributes, post-stack inversions, and pre-stack inversions.

A Neural Network is used to rank the many seismic attributes in their ability to capture the petrophysical property variations of the well logs. This includes Natural Fracture Density, Porosity, and TOC – the geologic drivers of Shale Capacity. The Relative Intercepted Shale Capacity (RISC) equation measures the proportion of a wellbore that intercepts good Shale Capacity. Using seven wells, the relationship between RISC and 90-Days Initial Production is derived. The well production is predicted for wells not used in the derivation. Shale Capacity and RISC are used to derive a relationship between reservoir properties and well performance in unconventional reservoirs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413079
2015-06-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ouenes, A.
    , 2014, Distribution of Well Performances in Shale Reservoirs and their Predictions Using the Concept of Shale Capacity. 2014 SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, SPE 167779.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ReaganJ., WojcikE., FacklerM., OuenesA.
    , 2013, Predicting Well Performances Using the Shale Capacity Concept: Application to the Haynesville. AAPG Search and Discovery Article # 41204.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WhitcombeD., ConnollyP., ReaganR., RedshawT.
    2002. Extended elastic impedance for fluid and lithology prediction. Geophysics67, 63–67.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413079
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413079
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error