The links between MRS parameters and the hydrogeological parameters

References

1. AllenD., AndreaniM., BadryR., FlaumC., GossenbergP., HorkowitzJ., SingerJ. and WhiteJ.1997. How to use borehole NMR.Schlumberger’s Oilfield Review, Summer, 34–57.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BeauceA., BernardJ., LegchenkoA. and VallaP.1996. A new geophysical technique for hydrogeological studies: the application of the nuclear magnetic resonance.Hydrogéologie1996(1), 71–77.
   [Google Scholar]
3. CastanyG. and MargatJ.1977. Dictionnaire Francais d’Hydrogéologie.BRGM, Orleans.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dunn2002. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ‐ Petrophysical and Logging Applications.Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
   [Google Scholar]
5. GoldmanM., RabinovichB., GiladD., GevI. and SchirovM.1994. Application of the integrated NMR‐TDEM method in the groundwater exploration in Israel.Journal of Applied Geophysics31, 27–52.
   [Google Scholar]
6. KenyonW.E.1997. Petrophysical principles of applications of NMR logging.The Log Analyst, March‐April, 21—43.
   [Google Scholar]
7. rLachassagneP., BaltassatJ.‐M., LegchenkoA. and Machard de GramontH.2003a. Links between MRS and the parameters used by the hydro‐geologists: a methodological approach for the quantitative hydrogeological calibration of MRS measurements. In: 2nd International Workshop on the Magnetic Resonance Sounding Method Applied to Non‐invasive Groundwater Investigations, Vol. 1, pp. 57–60. BRGM, Orleans.
   [Google Scholar]
8. LachassagneP., Machard de GramontH., BaltassatJ.‐M. and LegchenkoA.2003b. Etalonnage hydrogéologique de la méthode de prospection par Résonnance Magnétique Protonique. Cas des aquiferes sédimentaires. Rapport BRGM n° BRGM/RP‐52248‐FR.
   [Google Scholar]
9. LegchenkoA.2004. Magnetic Resonance Sounding: enhanced modeling of a phase shift.Applied Magnetic Resonance25, 621–636.
   [Google Scholar]
10. LegchenkoA., BaltassatJ.‐M., BeauceA. and BernardJ.2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists.Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
11. LegchenkoA., BaltassatJ.‐M., BobachevA., MartinC., RobainH. and VouillamozJ.M.2004. Magnetic Resonance Sounding applied to aquifer characterization.Ground Water42, 363–373.
    [Google Scholar]
12. LegchenkoA.V. and ShushakovO.A.1998. Inversion of surface NMR data.Geophysics63, 75–84.
    [Google Scholar]
13. LegchenkoA. and VallaP.2002. A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance soundings measurements.Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 3–19.
    [Google Scholar]
14. LubczynskiM. and RoyJ.2003. Hydrogeological interpretation and potential of the new magnetic resonance sounding (MRS) method.Journal of Hydrology28, 319–340.
    [Google Scholar]
15. LubczynskiM. and RoyJ.2004. Magnetic resonance sounding (MRS): new method for groundwater assessment.Ground Water42, 291–303.
    [Google Scholar]
16. de MarsilyG.1981. Quantitative Hydrogeology. Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers.Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
17. PlataJ. and RubioF.2002. MRS experiments in a noisy area of detrital aquifer in the south of Spain.Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 83–94.
    [Google Scholar]
18. PriceM.1993. Groundwater movement in the Chalk aquifer in England.Hydrogeologie1993(2), 147–150.
    [Google Scholar]
19. RoyJ. and LubczynskiM.2003. The MRS technique and its use for groundwater investigations.Hydrogeology Journal11, 455–465.
    [Google Scholar]
20. T.M.t.f.g.r.e.‐T.r.f.s.s.i.S.Africa
    Roy, J. and LubczynskiM.W.2000. The MRS technique for groundwater. In XXXIAH Congress on Groundwater: past achievements and future challenges (edited by T.M.t.f.g.r.e.‐T.r.f.s.s.i.S.Africa ), pp. 273–279. SililoO. et al., Cape Town.
    [Google Scholar]
21. SchirovM., LegchenkoA. and CreerG.1991. New direct non‐invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia.Exploration Geophysics22, 333–338.
    [Google Scholar]
22. SenP.N., StraleyC., KenyonW.E. and WhittinghamM.S.1990. Surface‐to‐volume ratio, charge density, nuclear magnetic relaxation and permeability in clay bearing sandstones.Geophysics55, 61–69.
    [Google Scholar]
23. TimurA.1968. An investigation of permeability, porosity, and residual water saturation relationship. Annual Logging Symposium Transactions: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Paper K.
    [Google Scholar]
24. TimurA.1969a. Producible porosity and permeability of sandstones investigated through nuclear magnetic resonance principles.The Log Analyst, January‐February, 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
25. TimurA.1969b. Pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance studies of porosity, moveable fluid, and permeability of sandstones.Journal of Petroleum Technology21, 775–786.
    [Google Scholar]
26. VouillamozJ.M.2003. La caractérisation des aquifères par une méthode non‐invasive : les sondages par résonance magnétique protonique.PhD Thesis, Université de Paris XI, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
27. VouillamozJ.M., LegchenkoA., AlbouyY., BakalowiczM., BaltassatJ.‐M. and Al‐FaresW.2003. Localization of saturated karst aquifer with magnetic resonance sounding and resistivity imagery.Ground Water41, 578–587.
    [Google Scholar]
28. WeichmanP.B., LavelyE.M. and RitzwollerM.H.2000. Theory of surface nuclear magnetic resonnance with applications to geophysical imaging problems.Physical ReviewE62(1), 1290–1312.
    [Google Scholar]
29. WynsR., BaltassatJ.M., LachassagneP., LegchenkoA. and VaironJ.2004. Application of proton magnetic resonance soundings to ground‐water reserves mapping in weathered basement rocks (Brittany, France).Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France175(1), 21–34.
    [Google Scholar]
30. YaramanciU., LangeG. and HertrichM.2002. Aquifer characterization using surface NMR jointly with other geophysical techniques at the Nauen/Berlin test site.Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 47–65.
    [Google Scholar]