Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) properties of unconsolidated sediments in field and laboratory

References

1. AbragamA.1983. Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, pp. 297–309, 63–65. Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ArchieG.1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics.Transactions of the American Institute of Mining Metallurgy and Engineering146, 54.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BearJ.1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media.American Elsevier Publishing Co., New York.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BenéG.J.1980. Nuclear magnetism of liquid systems in the earth field range.Physics Reports58,(4), 213–267.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BloembergenN., PurcellE.M. and PoundR.V.1948. Relaxation effects in nuclear magnetic resonance absorption.Physics Review73, 679–712.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BrownsteinK.R. and TarrC.E.1977. Spin‐lattice relaxation in a system governed by diffusion.Journal of Magnetic Resonance26, 17–24.
   [Google Scholar]
7. FukushimaE. and RoederB.W.1981. Experimental Pulse NMR.Addison–Wesley Publishing Co.
   [Google Scholar]
8. GoldbeckJ.2002. Hydrogeophysical measurements at the test‐site Nauen – evaluation and optimization.MSc thesis, Technical University, Berlin.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HöltingB.1989. Hydrogeologie.3rd edition. Enke Verlag, Stuttgart.
   [Google Scholar]
10. KenyonW.1997. Petrophysical principles of applications of NMR logging. The Log Analyst38 (2), 21–43.
    [Google Scholar]
11. KrügerU.2001. Untersuchungen mit der Nuklearmagnetischen Resonanz (NMR) an Gesteinsproben und synthetischen Materialien.MSc. thesis, Technical University, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
12. LegchenkoA.V., BaltassatJ.‐M., BeauceA. and BernardJ.2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists.Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
13. LegchenkoA.V. and BeauceA.1999. Surface proton magnetic resonance method: What do users get?Proceedings of 5th Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, European Section,Budapest, pp. ?
    [Google Scholar]
14. LegchenkoA.V. and ShushakovO.A.1998. Inversion of surface NMR data.Geophysics63, 75–84.
    [Google Scholar]
15. LegchenkoA.V. and VallaP.2002. A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements.Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 3–19.
    [Google Scholar]
16. MohnkeO. and YaramanciU.2002. measurements with surface nuclear magnetic Resonance – realisation and assessment.Proceedings of EEGS‐ES,Aveiro, Portugal, pp. 559–562.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MüllerM., KrügerU. and YaramanciU.2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) properties of unconsolidated rocks and synthetic samples.Proceedings of EEGS‐ES,Aveiro, Portugal, pp. 339–342.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MüllerM. and YaramanciU.2004. Interpretation enhancement by combining SIP and NMR.Proceedings of 10th European Meeting on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics,Utrecht, NL, paper A006.
    [Google Scholar]
19. PapeH., ClauserC. and IfflandJ.1999. Permeability prediction for reservoir sandstones based on fractal pore space geometry.Geophysics64, 1447–1460.
    [Google Scholar]
20. PapeH., ClauserC., IfflandJ.2000. Permeability‐porosity relationship in sandstone based on fractal pore space geometry.Pure and Applied Geophysics157, 603–619.
    [Google Scholar]
21. SchönJ.H.1996. Physical Properties of Rocks: Fundamentals and Principles of Petrophysics. Vol. 18 of Handbook of Geophysical Exploration. Sect. 1; Vol. 18. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. SeeversD.O.1966. A nuclear magnetic method for determining the permeability of sandstones.Transactions of SPWLA, Paper L 24.
    [Google Scholar]
23. SenP., StraleyC., KenyonW. and WhittinghamM.1990. Surface‐to‐volume ratio, charge density nuclear magnetic relaxation, and permeability in clay‐bearing sandstones.Geophysics55, 61–69.
    [Google Scholar]
24. ShirovM., LegchenkoA. and CreerG.1991. A new direct non‐invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia.Exploration Geophysics22, 333–338.
    [Google Scholar]
25. SlaterL. and LesmesD.P.2002. Electrical‐hydraulic relationships observed for unconsolidated sediments.Water Resources Research38 (10), 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
26. StraleyC., RossiniD., VinegarH., TutunjianP. and MorrissC.1997. Core analysis by low‐field NMR.The Log Analyst38 (2), 84–94.
    [Google Scholar]
27. TimurA.1968. An investigation of permeability, porosity and residual water saturation relationships.Transactions of the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts: Annual Logging Symposium, Paper k.
    [Google Scholar]
28. TimurA.1969a. Producible porosity and permeability of sandstones investigated through nuclear magnetic resonance principles.The Log Analyst10(1), 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
29. TimurA.1969b. Pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance studies of porosity, moveable fluid, and permeability of sandstones.Journal of Petroleum Technology21, 775–786.
    [Google Scholar]
30. WatsonA.T. and ChangC.T.P.1997. Characterizing porous media with NMR methods.Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy31 (4), 343–386.
    [Google Scholar]
31. WillamowskiS.1997. NMR im Erdfeld.PhD thesis, University of Dortmund.
    [Google Scholar]
32. YaramanciU., LangeG. and HertrichM.2002. Aquifer characterisation using Surface NMR jointly with other geophysical techniques at the Nauen/Berlin test site.Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 47–65.
    [Google Scholar]
33. YaramanciU., LangeG. and KnodelK.1999. Surface NMR within a geophysical study of an aquifer at Haldensleben (Germany).Geophysical Prospecting47, 923–943.
    [Google Scholar]