Intra-survey Pressure Variations - Implications for 4D Seismic Interpretation

References

1. Alvarez, E. and MacBeth, C.
   •Alvarez, E. and MacBeth, C. (2014) An insightful parameterization for the flatlander’s interpretation of time-lapsed seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting62, 75–96.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AminiH.
   •AminiH. (2014) A pragmatic approach to simulator to seismic modelling for 4D seismic interpretation. PhD Thesis, Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Campbell, S., Ricketts, T. A., Davies, D. M. , Slater ,C. P., Lilley, G G, Brain, J., Stammeijer, J., and Evans, A.C.
   •Campbell, S., Ricketts, T. A., Davies, D. M. , Slater ,C. P., Lilley, G G, Brain, J., Stammeijer, J., and Evans, A.C. (2005) Improved 4D Seismic Repeatability - a West of Shetlands Towed Streamer acquisition case history. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005, pp. 2394–2397.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Eiken, O. and Tøndel, R
   •Eiken, O. and Tøndel, R (2005) Sensitivity of Time-lapse Seismic Data to Pore Pressure changes: Is Quantification Possible?Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 24 (12), 1250–1254.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Eriksrud, M.
   •Eriksrud, M. (2014) Seabed permanent reservoir monitoring (PRM) - A valid 4D seismic technology for fields in the North Sea. First Break, 32 (5), 67 – 73.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Falahat, R, Obidegwu, D., Shams, A., and MacBeth, C.
   •Falahat, R, Obidegwu, D., Shams, A., and MacBeth, C. (2014) The interpretation of amplitude changes in 4D seismic data arising from gas exsolution and dissolution, Petroleum Geoscience, 20, 303– 320.
   [Google Scholar]