1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 2, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 2 Number 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The characterization of heterogeneous soils using common geotechnical techniques often proves impossible when the size of the heterogeneity is larger than a few tens of centimetres. Geophysical investigation techniques based on seismic wave propagation can help engineers to characterize the mechanical properties of such materials. In this paper, both refracted and surface waves are used to estimate the mechanical properties of an equivalent homogeneous medium.

A summary of the main results obtained numerically using finite‐element computations and homogenization theory is presented. It is shown that, for first‐mode surface‐wave wavelengths larger than 7.5 times the nominal size of the heterogeneity and within certain heterogeneity concentration ranges (up to 50% for matrix dominant soils), surface waves homogenize the soil in accordance with classical homogenization theory.

To validate these numerical results, a reduced‐scale model was built and seismograms, generated with a falling weight, were recorded. The phase‐velocity dispersion curve of the generated surface waves is inverted in order to obtain the shear‐wave velocity of the heterogeneous layer. The compressional‐wave velocity is calculated by means of seismic refraction analysis. Velocities obtained on the reduced‐scale model correspond to those predicted by homogenization theory from individual measurements of matrix and inclusion velocities.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2004 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004022
2004-04-01
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004022
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbrahamO., PedersenH. and CôtePh.1998. Determination of shear velocity profiles for soil and concrete by analysis of seismic surface waves, 4th Meet. EEGS‐ES, Barcelona, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BaguelinF., JezequelJ.F. and ShieldsD.H.1978. The Pressuremeter and Foundation Engineering. Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. ChammasR.2002. Détermination des caractéristiques mécaniques d’un sol hétérogène par les ondes de surface. PhD Thesis, University of Nantes, France.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ChammasR., AbrahamO., CôtePh, PedersenH.A. and SemblatJ.‐F.2003. Characterization of heterogeneous soils using surface waves: homogenization and numerical modelling.International Journal of Geomechanics, 3(1), 55–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ChristensenR.M. and LoK.H.1979. Solution for effective shear properties in three phase sphere and cylinder models.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids27, 315–330.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. FerberV., AbrahamO., Apport des méthodes sismiques pour la détermination des modules élastiques initiaux : application au site expérimental de Merville, International Symposium on Identification and Determination of Soil and Rock Parameters for Geotechnical Design, Paris, 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. GabrielsP., SniederR. and NoletG.1987. In situ measurements of shear wave velocity in sediments with higher‐mode Rayleigh waves.Geophysical Prospecting35, 187–196.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. HerrmannR.B.1985. Computer Programs in Seismology. Saint Louis University.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. HumbertP.1989. CESAR‐LCPC : un code général de calcul par éléments finis.Bulletin des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées160, 112–115.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. JongmansD., DemanetD., HorrentC., CampilloM. and Sanchez‐SesmaF.J.1996. Dynamic soil parameters determination by geophysical prospecting in Mexico City: implication for site effect modelling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering15, 549–559.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. KronerE.1978. Self‐consistent scheme and graded disorder in polycrys‐tal elasticity. Journal of Phys. R.8, 2261.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. MatthewsM.C., HopeV.S. and ClaytonC.R.I.1996. The use of surface waves in the determination of ground stiffness profiles.Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers and Geotechnical Engineering199, 84–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. McMehanG.A. and YedlinM.J.1981. Analysis of dispersive waves by wave field transformation.Geophysics46, 869–874.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. NazarianS. and DesaiM.R.1981. Automated surface wave method field testing. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering119, 1094–1111.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. YinH., MavkoG., MukerjiT. and NurA.1995. Scale effects on dynamic wave propagation in heterogeneous media.Geophysical Research Letters22, 3163–3166.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004022
Loading
Mechanical characterization of heterogeneous soils with surface waves: experimental validation on reduced‐scale physical models
Near Surface Geophysics 2, 249 (2004); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2004022
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004022
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004022
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error