1887

Abstract

Summary

Seismic interferometry makes it possible to reconstruct redatumed signals creating virtual sources at receivers. The conventional method utilizes the crosscorrelation of recorded signals from a plurality of sources to estimate the Green’s function between receivers. Great advantages are to remove the propagation effects outside the representation zone, and redatum signals without the need of velocity model. The seismic interferometry method requires an appropriate and complete distribution of seismic sources around the receivers for signal representation with stationary conditions. Lack of coverage may results in ghost and artefacts. However, the condition to have only partial coverage by sources is common. Recently, a method was proposed to overcome these limitations and to extend the stationary conditions for selected events. The tangent-phase interferometry (TPI) corrects the phase in the cross-correlations before integral representation. This approach requires identification of the signal trends for selected events in the cross correlations, and corresponds to move the virtual source from receiver positions to projected points on the signal wavefronts. We present a review of TPI applications, with the analysis of emerging aspects in different examples. This review is aimed at evaluating advantages and critical issues in the joint use of TPI with other inversion and imaging methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413578
2015-06-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakulin, A. and Calvert, R.
    [2006] The virtual source method: Theory and case study. Geophysics, 71(4), SI139–SI150.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Poletto, F., Farina, B. and Böhm, G.
    [2012] Seismic interferometry using a generalized-phase approach. 74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2013a] Tangent-phase interferometry, time lapse application and sensitivity analysis. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2013b] Diffraction analysis by tangent-phase interferometry. 83rd SEG Annual Meeting, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Poletto, F., Farina, B., Böhm, G., and Miranda, F.
    [2014a] Salt flank detection by seismic interferometry including tangent-phase approach. 84th SEG Annual Meeting, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Poletto, F., Farina, B., Böhm, G. and Wapenaar, K.
    [2014b] Seismic interferometry by tangent-phase correction. Geophysical Prospecting, doi:10.1111/1365–2478.12209.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365–2478.12209 [Google Scholar]
  7. Schuster, G.T.
    [2009] Seismic Interferometry. Cambridge University Press, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Snieder, R.
    [2004] Extracting the Green's function from the correlation of coda waves: A derivation based on stationary phase. Physical Review E69, 046610.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wapenaar, K., Draganov, D. and Robertsson, J.
    [2008] Seismic interferometry: History and present status. Society of Exploration Geophysics, Geophysics Reprint Series, 26, ISBN 978-56080-150-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wapenaar, K. and Fokkema, J.
    [2006] Green's function representations for seismic interferometry. Geophysics, 71(4), SI33–SI46.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413578
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413578
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error