1887
Volume 63 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A 3D seismic survey was recorded in 2012 to explore a petrothermal reservoir in a late‐Variscan granitic pluton within the Erzgebirge (Ore Mountains) in Saxony, Germany. The main objective was to test this area in the context of the Enhanced Geothermal System concept and to test the 3D seismic technique as an exploration tool. The intention and challenge are to image and characterize potentially permeable fracture zones at target depths of 5–6 km, with temperatures above 150 °C. Unconventional methods were applied for field acquisition and data processing. The vibroseis technique was used in the core experiment, accompanied by a special explosive seismic experiment. Field acquisition was characterized by severe noise conditions and a highly irregular layout. These conditions required extensive preprocessing and data conditioning. The imaging started with conventional Common Midpoint processing for quality control and for a first reference. Better images were obtained by Common Reflection Surface processing with subsequent post‐stack time migration. Prestack time migration was also used for comparison. Outstanding results were obtained by the ‘operator‐oriented’ version of the Common Reflection Surface technique. A rich repertoire of structures within the granite pluton was imaged, including steeply dipping fault zones and conjugate faults. Images and indications of fracture and crack porosity of a prominent fault zone provide the background to define an optimum drill path. This is considered as the next stage for a possible geothermal plant, if a decision is taken to drill a research well in the future. The 3D seismic reflection technique was shown to be an indispensable tool for geothermal exploration, even in crystalline basement rocks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12249
2015-04-23
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abul KhairH., CookeD. and HandM.2015. Seismic mapping and geomechanical analyses of faults within deep hot granites, a workflow for enhanced geothermal system projects. Geothermics53, 46–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AdamE., PerronG., ArnoldG., MatthewsL. and MilkereitB.2003. 3D seismic imaging for VMS deposit exploration, Matagami, Quebec. In: Hardrock Seismic Exploration (eds D.W.Eaton , B.Milkereit and M.H.Salisbury ), pp. 229–246. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, ISBN 1–56080–114‐X.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AgemarT., WeberJ. and SchulzR.2014. Deep geothermal energy production in Germany. Energies7(7), 4397–4416.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AhmedK. A., SchwarzB. and GajewskiD.2015. Application of the 3D common‐reflection‐surface stack workflow in crystalline rock environment. Energies7(7), 4397–4416.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BaykulovM. and GajewskiD.2009. Prestack seismic data enhancement with partial common‐reflection‐surface CRS stack. Geophysical Prospecting63(4), 941–949.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BergerH.‐J., FelixM., GörneS., KochE., KrentzO., FörsterA.et al. 2011. Forschungsbericht Tiefengeothermie Sachsen, Schriftenreihe 9/2011, 127 p., appendices. Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie, Dresden. https://publikationen.sachsen.de/bdb/artikel/15145.
  7. CasiniM., CiuffiS., FiordelisiA., MazzottiA. and StucchiE.2010. Results of a 3D seismic survey at the Travale (Italy) test site. Geothermics39, 4–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CordsenA., GalbraithM. and Peirce. 2000. Planning Land 3‐D Seismic Surveys. Geophysical Developments Series No. 9, 204 p. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, ISBN 1–56080–089–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. EatonD.W., MilkereitB. and SalisburyM.H.2003. Hardrock Seismic Exploration. Geophysical Developments Series No 10, 270 p. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, ISBN 1–56080–114‐X.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FörsterH.‐J., RomerR. L., GottesmannB., TischendorfG. and RhedeD.2009. Are the granites of the Aue‐Schwarzenberg Zone (Erzgebirge, Germany) a major source for metalliferous ore deposits? A geochemical, Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic and geochemical study. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie – Abhandlungen186, 163–184.
  11. HarjesH.‐P., BramK., DürbaumH.‐J., GebrandeH., HirschmannG., JanickM.et al. 1997. Origin and nature of crustal reflections: Results from integrated seismic measurements at the KTB superdeep drilling site. Journal of Geophysical Research102, (B8), 18 267–18 288.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HlousekF., HellwigO. and BuskeS.2015. Three‐dimensional focused seismic imaging for geothermal exploration in crystalline rock near Schneeberg, Germany. Geophysical Prospecting63(4) 999–1014.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HoechtG., RicarteP., BerglerS. and LandaE.2009. Operator‐oriented CRS interpolation. Geophysical Prospecting57, 957–979.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HoechtG., RostF. and LüschenE.2014. Operator‐oriented stacking and azimuth‐dependant stacking velocities in CRS imaging. 76th EAGE meeting, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Expanded Abstracts, We D201 07.
  15. HofmannY., JahrT. and JentzschG.2003. Three‐dimensional gravimetric modelling to detect the deep structure of the region Vogtland/NW‐Bohemia. Journal of Geodynamics35, 209–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. JägerR., MannJ., HöchtG. and HubralP.2001. Common‐reflection‐surface stack: Image and attributes. Geophysics66, 97–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LamarcheG.1992. Seismic reflection survey in the geothermal field of the Rotorua caldera, New Zealand. Geothermics21, 109–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LüschenE., DusselM., ThomasR. and SchulzR.2011. 3D seismic survey for geothermal exploration at Unterhaching, Munich, Germany. first break29, 45–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LüschenE. and SchulzR.2014. 3‐D seismic surveys explore German petrothermal reserves. Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union95(26), 237–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LüschenE., WolfgrammM., FritzerT., DusselM., ThomasR. and SchulzR.2014. 3D seismic survey explores geothermal targets for reservoir characterization at Unterhaching, Munich, Germany. Geothermics50, 167–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MajerE.L.2003. 3‐D seismic methods for geothermal reservoir exploration and assessment – Summary. Document from the Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Scientific and Technical Information, http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/840868, 33 p.
  22. MalehmirA., DurrheimR., BellefleurG., UrosevicM., JuhlinC., WhiteD.J.et al. 2012. Seismic methods in mineral exploration and mine planning: A general overview of past and present case histories and a look into the future. Geophysics77, WC173–WC190.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MatsushimaJ., OkuboY., RokugawaS., YokotaT., TanakaK., TsuchiyaT. and NaritaN.2003. Seismic reflector imaging by prestack time migration in the Kakkonda geothermal field, Japan. Geothermics32, 79–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PaschenH., OertelD. and GrünwaldR.2003. Possibilities for geothermal electricity generation in Germany, TAB report, 084, 129 p. Office of Technology Assessment at the German Bundestag, Berlin (in German with English abstract).
  25. WallnerO. and HillerA.2012. Bergbauinduzierte Seismizität im Umfeld der Uranerzgrube Schlema‐Alberoda. Markscheidewesen119, 16–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. WallnerO., HillerA., FrenzelM., ArndtA. and FrommholdR.2009. Detaillierte geowissenschaftliche Datenaufbereitung im Vorzugsgebiet Aue‐Schwarzenberg im Rahmen des Tiefengeothermieprojektes Sachsen. Unpublished report, Wismut GmbH, Chemnitz.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12249
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12249
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acquisition; Data processing; Imaging; Seismic

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error