1887
Volume 64, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Borehole seismic addresses the need for high‐resolution images and elastic parameters of the subsurface. Full‐waveform inversion of vertical seismic profile data is a promising technology with the potential to recover quantitative information about elastic properties of the medium. Full‐waveform inversion has the capability to process the entire wavefield and to address the wave propagation effects contained in the borehole data—multi‐component measurements; anisotropic effects; compressional and shear waves; and transmitted, converted, and reflected waves and multiples. Full‐waveform inversion, therefore, has the potential to provide a more accurate result compared with conventional processing methods.

We present a feasibility study with results of the application of high‐frequency (up to 60 Hz) anisotropic elastic full‐waveform inversion to a walkaway vertical seismic profile data from the Arabian Gulf. Full‐waveform inversion has reproduced the majority of the wave events and recovered a geologically plausible layered model with physically meaningful values of the medium.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12227
2015-12-15
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AsgharzadehM., BónaA., PevznerR., UrosevicM. and GurevichB.2013. Reliability of the slowness and slowness‐polarization methods for anisotropy estimation in VTI media from 3C walkaway VSP data. Geophysics78(5), WC93–WC102.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BarnesC. and ChararaM.2010. Anisotropic anelastic full waveform inversion: application to North Sea offset VSP data. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts29(1), 972–976.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BunksC., SalekF.M., ZaleskiS. and ChaventG.1995. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics60, 1457–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChararaM., BarnesC. and TarantolaA.1996a. The state of affairs in inversion of seismic data: an OVSP example. 66th Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1999–2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChararaM., BarnesC. and TarantolaA.1996b. Constrained seismic well data waveform inversion. Inverse Methods: Interdisciplinary Elements of Methodology, Computation and Applications (ed J.M.Sibani), pp. 98–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChararaM., VershininA., DegerE., SabitovD. and PekarG.2011. 3D spectral element method simulation of sonic logging in anisotropic viscoelastic media. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 432–437.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CraseE.1989. Robust elastic nonlinear inversion of seismic waveform data. PhD thesis, University of Houston, USA.
  8. GaoF., LevanderA.R., PrattR.G., ZeltC.A. and FradelizioG.L.2006. Waveform tomography at a groundwater contamination site: VSP‐surface data set. Geophysics71(1), H1–H11.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GholamiY., BrossierR., OpertoS., RibodettiA. and VirieuxJ.2013. Which parametrization is suitable for acoustic VTI full‐waveform inversion? Part 1: sensitivity and trade‐off analysis. Geophysics78(2), R81–R105.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HardageB.A.2000. Vertical Seismic Profiling: Principles. Handbook of Geophysical Exploration: Seismic Exploration. Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HorneS. and LeaneyS.2000. Short note: Polarization and slowness component inversion for TI anisotropy. Geophysical Prospecting48, 779–788.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. IgelH., DjikpésséH. and TarantolaA.1996. Waveform inversion of marine reflection seismograms for P impedance and Poisson's ratio. Geophysical Journal International124(2), 363–371.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KolbP., CollinoF. and LaillyP.1986. Prestack inversion of a 1‐D medium. Proceedings of the IEEE74, 498–506.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KomatitschD. and VilotteJ.P.1998. The spectral element method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America88, 368–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KomatitschD., BarnesC. and TrompJ.2000. Wave propagation near a fluid‐solid interface: A spectral‐element approach. Geophysics65(2), 623–631.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LeaneyS., CaoD. and TcherkashnevS.1999. Calibrating anisotropic, anelastic models for converted‐wave simulation. 61st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 6–52.
  17. LeaneyS., BaleR., WheelerM. and TcherkashnevS.2001. Borehole‐integrated anisotropic processing of converted modes. The Leading Edge20(9), 996–1007.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LeaneyS., 2008. Polar anisotropy from walkaway VSPs. The Leading Edge27(10), 1242–1250.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LiangL., LiM., RufinoR., DümmongS., AbubakarA., NuttL., et al. 2013. Application of frequency‐domain full‐waveform inversion for time‐lapse 3D VSP data interpretation in an extra heavy oil field. SEG Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nissen‐MeyerT., FournierA. and DahlenF.A.2007. A two‐dimensional spectral‐element method for computing spherical‐earth seismograms – I. Moment‐tensor source. Geophysical Journal International168, 1067–1092.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. OwusuJ.C., HorneS.A. and ShabbirA.2011. Slowness surface construction and inversion from 3D VSP data. First Break29(2), 45–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. OwusuJ.C., PodgornovaO., ChararaM., LeaneyS., CampbellA., AliS., et al. 2013a. Anisotropic full waveform inversion of walkaway VSP data from the Arabian Gulf. EAGE Borehole Geophysics Workshop II, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. OwusuJ.C., PodgornovaO., ChararaM., LeaneyS., CampbellA., AliS., et al. 2013b. Anisotropic elastic full‐waveform inversion for a real walkaway VSP data from the Arabian Gulf – towards high frequencies. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  24. RobertsM.A. and HornbyB.E.2007. Application of 2D full waveform inversion to walkaway VSP data for the estimation of sub‐salt elastic parameters. 69th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, C030.
  25. SinghS., SearsT., RobertsM., GosseletA., RoyleG. and BatonP.2008. Full elastic waveform inversion: future of quantitative seismic imaging. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1905–1909.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SilvestrovI., NeklyudovD., KostovC. and TcheverdaV.2013. Full‐waveform inversion for macro velocity model reconstruction in look‐ahead offset vertical seismic profile: numerical singular value decomposition‐based analysis. Geophysical Prospecting61(6), 1099–1113.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SymesW.W.1990. Velocity inversion: a case study in infinite‐dimensional optimization. Mathematical Programming48, 71–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. TarantolaA.1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics49(8), 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. TarantolaA.2005. Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ThomsenL.A.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. VirieuxJ. and OpertoS.2009. An overview of full‐waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics74(6).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. WapenaarC.P.A., VerschuurD.J. and HerrmannP.1992. Amplitude preprocessing of single and multicomponent seismic data. Geophysics57, 1178–1188.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12227
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12227
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Borehole geophysics; Elastic; Full waveform; Inversion; Seismic

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error