1887
Volume 64, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Borehole fluid injections are accompanied by microseismic activity not only during but also after termination of the fluid injection. Previously, this phenomenon has been analysed, assuming that the main triggering mechanism is governed by a linear pressure diffusion in a hydraulically isotropic medium. In this context the so‐called back front of seismicity has been introduced, which allows to characterize the hydraulic transport from the spatiotemporal distribution of post‐injection induced events. However, rocks are generally anisotropic, and in addition, fluid injections can strongly enhance permeability. In this case, permeability becomes a function of pressure. For such situations, we carry out a comprehensive study about the behaviour and parametrization of the back front. Based on a model of a factorized anisotropic pressure dependence of permeability, we present an approach to reconstruct the principal components of the diffusivity tensor. We apply this approach to real microseismic data and show that the back front characterizes the least hydraulic transport. To investigate the back front of non‐linear pore‐fluid pressure diffusion, we numerically consider a power‐law and an exponential‐dependent diffusivity. To account for a post‐injection enhanced hydraulic state of the rock, we introduce a model of a frozen (i.e., nearly unchanged after the stimulation) medium diffusivity and generate synthetic seismicity. We find that, for a weak non‐linearity and 3D exponential diffusion, the linear diffusion back front is still applicable. This finding is in agreement with microseismic data from Ogachi and Fenton Hill. However, for a strong non‐linear fluid–rock interaction such as hydraulic fracturing, the back front can significantly deviate from a time dependence of a linear diffusion back front. This is demonstrated for a data set from the Horn River Basin. Hence, the behaviour of the back front is a strong indicator of a non‐linear fluid–rock interaction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12247
2015-12-15
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AudiganeP., RoyerJ.J. and KaiedaH.2002. Permeability characterization of the Soultz and Ogachi large‐scale reservoir using induced microseismicity. Geophysics67(1), 204–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BaischS., WeidlerR., VörösR., WybornD. and de GraafL.2006. Induced Seismicity during the Stimulation of a Geothermal HFR Reservoir in Cooper Basin, Australia. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96(6), 2242–2256.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BestM.E. and KatsubeT.J.1995. Shale permeability and its significance in hydrocarbon exploration. The Leading Edge14(3), 165–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BrownD., DuTeauxR., KrugerP., SwensonD. and YamaguchiT.1999. Fluid circulation and heat extraction from engineered geothermal reservoirs. Geothermics28(4–5), 553–572.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DaleyT.M., SchoenbergM.A., RutqvistJ. and NiheiK.T.2006. Fractured reservoirs: an analysis of coupled elastodynamic and permeability changes from pore‐pressure variation. Geophysics71(5), O33–O41.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DinskeC., ShapiroS.A. and LadnerF.2009. Seismicity Based Reservoir Characterization of Basel Geothermal Site. Proceedings of the 71st European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers Annual Conference and Exhibition, Paper P033.
  7. DinskeC., ShapiroS.A. and RutledgeJ.T.2010. Interpretation of Microseismicity Resulting from Gel and Water Fracturing of Tight Gas Reservoirs. Pure and Applied Geophysics167(1–2), 169–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DreesenD.S. and NicholsonR.W., 1985. Well completion and operations for MHF of Fenton Hill HDR Well EE‐2. Transactions of the Geothermal Resources Council9(II), 89–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DyerB., JuppeA., JonesR.H., ThomasT.I., Williams‐RichardJ. and JacquesP.1994. Microseismic results from the European HDR Geothermal Project at Soultz‐sous‐Forêts, Alsace, France IR03/24, CSM Associates Ltd.
  10. EconomidesM.J. and NolteK.G.2000. Reservoir Stimulation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FehlerM., HouseL., PhillipsW.S. and PotterR.1998. A method to allow temporal variation of velocity in travel‐time tomography using microearthquakes induced during hydraulic fracturing. Tectonophysics289(1–3), 189–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FehlerM.C.1989. Stress Control of Seismicity Patterns Observed During Hydraulic Fracturing Experiments at the Fenton Hill Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy Site, New Mexico. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts26(3–4), 211–219.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. FischerT., HainzlS., EisnerL., ShapiroS.A. and Le CalvezJ.2008. Microseismic signatures of hydraulic fracture growth in sediment formations: observations and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research113(B02307).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. FisherM.K., WrightC.A., DavidsonB.M., GoodwinA.K., FielderE.O., BucklerW.S.et al. 2002. Integrating Fracture Mapping Technologies to Optimize Stimulations in the Barnett Shale. Proceedings, Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, Paper 77441 pp.
  15. Goertz‐AllmannB.P. and WiemerS.2013. Geomechanical modeling of induced seismicity source parameters and implications for seismic hazard assessment. Geophysics78(1), KS25–KS39.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HäringM.O., SchanzU., LadnerF. and DyerB.C.2008. Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics37(5), 469–495.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HouseL.1987. Locating microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing in crystalline rock. Geophysical Research Letters14(9), 919–921.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HummelN. and MüllerT.M.2009. Microseismic signatures of non‐linear pore‐fluid pressure diffusion. Geophysical Journal International179(3), 1558–1565.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HummelN. and ShapiroS.A.2012. Microseismic estimates of hydraulic diffusivity in case of non‐linear fluid‐rock interaction. Geophysical Journal International188(3), 1441–1453.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HummelN. and ShapiroS.A.2013. Nonlinear diffusion‐based interpretation of induced microseismicity: a Barnett Shale hydraulic fracturing case study. Geophysics78(5), B211–B226.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ItoH.2003. Inferred role of natural fractures, veins, and breccias in development of the artificial geothermal reservoir at the Ogachi hot dry rock site, Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research108(B9).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. JaegerJ., CookN. and ZimmermanR.2007. Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, 4th edn. Wiley‐Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. KaiedaH., SasakiS. and WybornD.2010. Comparison of Characteristics of Micro‐Earthquakes Observed During Hydraulic Stimulation Operations in Ogachi, Hijiori and Cooper Basin HDR Projects. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Bali, Indonesia, 25–29 April, 2010.
  24. LangenbruchC. and ShapiroS.A.2010. Decay rate of fluid‐induced seismicity after termination of reservoir stimulations. Geophysics75(6), MA53–MA62.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LiM., BernabéY., XiaoW.I., ChenZ.Y. and LiuZ.Q.2009. Effective pressure law for permeability of E‐bei sandstones. Journal of Geophysical Research114(B07205).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MaderD.1989. Hydraulic Proppant Fracturing and Gravel Packing. Developments in Petroleum Science. Elsevier Science. ISBN 9780080868844.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MillichE., NeugebauerH.J., HuengesE. and NoverG.1998. Pressure dependence of permeability and Earth tide induced fluid flow. Geophysical Research Letters25(6), 809–812.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. NathensonM.1999. The dependence of permeability on effective stress from flow tests at hot dry rock reservoirs at Rosemanowes (Cornwall) and Fenton Hill (New Mexico). Geothermics28, 315–340.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ParotidisM., ShapiroS.A. and RothertE.2004. Back front of seismicity induced after termination of borehole fluid injection. Geophysical Research Letters31(L02612).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ReineC. and DunphyR.2011. Weighing in on the seismic scale: the use of seismic fault measurements for constructing discrete fracture networks in the Horn River Basin. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  31. RothertE. and ShapiroS.A.2003. Microseismic monitoring of borehole fluid injections: data modeling and inversion for hydraulic properties of rocks. Geophysics68(2), 685–689.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ShapiroS.A. and DinskeC.2009a. Fluid‐induced seismicity: pressure diffusion and hydraulic fracturing. Geophysical Prospecting57(2), 301–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. ShapiroS.A. and DinskeC.2009b. Scaling of seismicity induced by nonlinear fluid‐rock interaction. Journal of Geophysical Research114(B09307).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. ShapiroS.A., DinskeC. and RothertE.2006. Hydraulic‐fracturing controlled dynamics of microseismic clouds. Geophysical Research Letters33(L24321).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ShapiroS.A., RothertE., RathV. and RindschwentnerJ.2002. Characterization of fluid transport properties of reservoirs using induced microseismicity. Geophysics67, 212–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. UrbancicT., ShumilaV., RudledgeJ. and ZinnoR.1999. Determining hydraulic fracture behavior using microseismicity. Vail Rock '99, 37thU.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium, Vail, Colorado.
  37. WallsJ.D., NurA.M. and BourbieT.1982. Effects of pressure and partial water saturation on gas permeability in tight sands: experimental results. Journal of Petroleum Technology34(4), 930–936.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. YilmazO., Nolen‐HoeksemaR.C. and NurA.1994. Pore pressure profiles in fractured and compliant rocks. Geophysical Prospecting42, 693–714.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12247
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12247
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error