1887
Volume 6 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We explore the viability of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) to quantify soil water content in a full‐scale dike model. While ERT is an established method to detect changes in soil water content, the retrieval of two‐dimensional water content distributions from surface‐based surveys is a much more challenging application. We conducted a series of experiments on a full‐scale dike model comprising rainfall and flooding events. The dike was surveyed with an ERT line down the land‐side slope and monitored with permanently installed spatial time‐domain reflectometry (TDR) cables for comparison. Water content changes were calculated by applying Archie’s equation and agreed well with comparison measurements from spatial TDR measurements. The saturation exponent in Archie’s equation was estimated by combining spatial TDR and ERT measurements and agreed well with literature data of comparable sands. The choice of the inversion type, e.g., time‐lapse inversion or least‐squares versus robust constraint, as well as the influence of inversion parameters, such as regularization and the choice of convergence criterion, is discussed in the context of an apparent inversion artefact for the rainfall experiment, using forward modelling of synthetic data sets. The results indicate that ERT may be a feasible method to quantify water content changes under certain conditions, provided an initial water content estimate is available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007038
2007-12-01
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ArchieG.E.1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers146, 55–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BiebersteinA.1999. Leckageortung bei geotechnischen Dichtungen mittels elektrischem Potentialverfahren. PhD thesis. Institute for Soil Mechanics and Rock Mechanics, University of Karlsruhe, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BinleyA., Henry‐PoulterS. and ShawB.1996. Examination of solute transport in an undisturbed soil column using electrical resistance tomography. Water Resources Research32, 763–769.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BinleyA., WinshipP., WestL.J., PokarM. and MiddletonR.2002. Seasonal variation of moisture content in unsaturated sandstone inferred from borehole radar and resistivity profiles. Journal of Hydrology267, 160–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BrandelikA. and HuebnerC.2003. Moisture monitoring in waste disposal surface barriers. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment84, 61–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DailyW. and RamirezA.1992. Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement. Water Resources Research28, 1429–1442.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DailyW., RamirezA., BinleyA. and LaBrecqueD.2004. Electrical resistance tomography. The Leading Edge23, 438–442.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DannowskiG. and YaramanciU.1999. Estimation of water content and porosity using combined radar and geoelectrical measurements. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics4, 71–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Day‐LewisF.D., SinghaK. and BinleyA.M.2005. Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution‐dependent limitations. Journal of Geophysical Research110, B08206.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DeGroot‐HedlinC. and ConstableS.1990. Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two‐dimensional models from magnetotelluric data. Geophysics55, 1613–1624.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GalagedaraL.W., ParkinG.W. and RedmanJ.D.2005. Measuring and modeling of direct ground wave depth penetration under transient soil moisture conditions. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications6, 192–205.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GaramboisS., SénéchalP. and PerroudH.2002. On the use of combined geophysical methods to assess water content and water conductivity of near‐surface formations. Journal of Hydrology259, 32–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GreavesR.J., LesmesD.P., LeeJ.M. and ToksoezM.N.1996. Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi‐offset, ground‐penetrating radar. Geophysics61, 683–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GrecoR.2006. Soil water content inverse profiling from single TDR waveforms. Journal of Hydrology317, 325–339.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GroteK., HubbardS. and RubinY.2003. Field‐scale estimation of volumetric water content using GPR groundwave techniques. Water Resources Research39, 1321.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HauckC. and Vonder MuehllD.2003. Inversion and interpretation of two‐dimensional geoelectrical measurements for detecting permafrost in mountainous regions. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes14, 305–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HennigT., WellerA. and CanhT.2005. The effect of dike geometry on different resistivity configurations. Journal of Applied Geophysics57, 278–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. IgelJ.S., AnschuetzH.R., SchmalholzJ., WilhelmH., BrehW., HoetzelH. and HuebnerC.2001. Methods for determining soil moisture with the ground penetrating radar. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electromagnetic Wave Interaction with Water and Moist Substances. Weimar.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. JohanssonS. and DahlinT.1996. Seepage monitoring in an earth embankment dam by repeated resistivity monitoring. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics1, 229–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KemnaA., VanderborghtJ., KulessaB. and VereeckenH.2002. Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models. Journal of Hydrology267, 125–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. KoenigerF., NueeschR., Rabl‐LasarW., RothJ., RuppertR. and SchuhmannR.2005. Alternative surface covering of landfill using the TAUPE sealing monitoring system. In: Proceedings of ISEMA 2005, 6th International Conference on Electromagnetic Wave Interaction with Water and Moist Substances. Weimar.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LaBrecqueD.J. and YangX.2001. Difference inversion of ERT data: A fast inversion method for 3D in‐situ monitoring. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics5, 83–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LokeM.H.1999a. Time‐lapse resistivity imaging inversion. In: Proceedings of the 5thMeeting of the EEGS European Section.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LokeM.H.1999b. RES2DMOD: Rapid 2D resistivity forward modelling using the finite‐difference and finite‐element methods. Report GeoTomo LLC, Penang, Malaysia.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1995. Least‐squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity. Geophysics60, 1682–1690.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. LokeM.H., AcworthI. and DahlinT.2003. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics34, 182–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. OswaldB., BenedickterH.R., BaechtoldW. and FluehlerH.2003. Spatially resolved water content profiles from inverted TDR signals. Water Resources Research39, 1357.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. RingsJ., WoerschingH. and HauckC.2005. Comparing time‐domain reflectometry and electrical resistivity tomography on a dike model. Near Surface 2005, Palermo, Italy, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. RubinY. and HubbardS.2005. Hydrogeophysics. Water Science and Technology Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ScheuermannA.2005. Instationaere Durchfeuchtung quasi‐homogener Erddeiche. PhD thesis. Institute for Soil Mechanics and Rock Mechanics, University of Karlsruhe, Germany
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ScheuermannA., SchlaegerS., HuebnerC., BrandelikA. and BraunsJ.2001. Monitoring of the spatial soil water distribution on a full‐scale dike model. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electromagnetic Wave Interaction with Water and Moist Substances, pp. 343–350. Weimar.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. SchlaegerS.2005. A fast TDR‐inversion technique for the reconstruction of spatial soil moisture content. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences9, 481–492.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SchmalholzJ., StoffregenH., KemnaA. and YaramanciU.2004. Imaging of water content distributions inside a lysimeter using GPR tomography. Vadose Zone Journal3, 1106–1115.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SinghaK. and GorelickS.M.2006a. Effects of spatially variable resolution on field‐scale estimates of tracer concentration from electrical inversions using Archie’s law. Geophysics71, G83–G91.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SinghaK. and GorelickS.M.2006b. Hydrogeophysical tracking of three‐dimensional tracer migration: The concept and application of apparent petrophysical relations. Water Resources Research42, W06422.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. SjoedahlP., DahlinT. and JohanssonS.2004. Using resistivity measurements for dam safety evaluation at Enemossen tailings dam. Near Surface 2004, Utrecht, The Netherlands, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. SjoedahlP., DahlinT. and JohanssonS.2006. 2.5D resistivity modeling of embankment dams to assess influence from geometry and material properties. Geophysics71, 107–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. SlaterL., BinleyA., DailyW. and JohnsonR.2000. Cross‐hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. Journal of Applied Geophysics44, 85–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. SlaterL., BinleyA., VersteegR., CassianiG., BirkenR. and SandbergS.2002. A 3D ERT study of solute transport in a large experiment. Journal of Applied Geophysics49, 221–229.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. StachederM., HuebnerC., SchlaegerS. and BrandelikA.2005. Combined TDR and low frequency permittivity measurements for continuous snow density determination. In: Electromagnetic Aquametry (ed. K.Kupfer), pp. 367–382. Springer‐Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. StaehliM., StachederM., GustafssonD., SchlaegerS., SchneebeliM. and BrandelikA.2004. A new in‐situ sensor for large‐scale snow cover monitoring. Annals of Glaciology38, 273–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. SuzukiK. and HigashiS.2001. Groundwater flow after heavy rain in landside‐slope area from 2D‐inversion of resistivity monitoring data. Geophysics66, 733–743.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. TuressonA.2006. Water content and porosity estimated from ground‐penetrating radar and resistivity. Journal of Applied Geophysics58, 99–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. UlrichC. and SlaterL.D.2004. Induced polarization measurements on unsaturated, unconsolidated sands. Geophysics69, 762–771.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. WellerA., CanhT., BreedeK. and VuN.T.2006. Multi‐electrode measurements at Thai Binh dikes (Vietnam). Near Surface Geophysics4, 135–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. WolkeR. and SchwetlickH.1988. Iteratively reweighted least‐squares algorithms, convergence analysis and numerical comparisons. SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computations9, 907–921.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. WollschlaegerU. and RothK.2005. Estimation of temporal changes of volumetric soil water content from Ground‐Penetrating Radar reflections. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications6, 207–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. ZhouQ.Y., ShimadaJ. and SatoA.2001. Three‐dimensional spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content using electrical resistivity tomography. Water Resources Research37, 273–285.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007038
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2007038
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error