1887
Volume 64, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We propose a method for imaging small‐scale diffraction objects in complex environments in which Kirchhoff‐based approaches may fail. The proposed method is based on a separation between the specular reflection and diffraction components of the total wavefield in the migrated surface angle domain. Reverse‐time migration was utilized to produce the common image gathers. This approach provides stable and robust results in cases of complex velocity models. The separation is based on the fact that, in surface angle common image gathers, reflection events are focused at positions that correspond to the apparent dip angle of the reflectors, whereas diffracted events are distributed over a wide range of angles. The high‐resolution radon‐based procedure is used to efficiently separate the reflection and diffraction wavefields. In this study, we consider poststack diffraction imaging. The advantages of working in the poststack domain are its numerical efficiency and the reduced computational time. The numerical results show that the proposed method is able to image diffraction objects in complex environments. The application of the method to a real seismic dataset illustrates the capability of the approach to extract diffractions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12280
2015-12-15
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BaysalE., KosloffD. and SherwoodJ.1983. Reverse time migration. Geophysics48, 1514–1524.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BrowaeysT.J.2008. Dip‐angle common‐image gathers by wave‐equation migration. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3003–3007.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DickensT. and WinbowG.2011. RTM angle gathers using Poynting vectors. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3109–3113.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. EhingerA., LaillyP. and MarfurtK.1996. Green's function implementation of common‐offset, wave‐equation migration. Geophysics61, 1813–1821.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. EtgenJ.2012. 3D wave equation Kirchhoff migration. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. FomelS., LandaE. and TanerM.T.2007. Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions. Geophysics72, U89–U94.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GiboliM., BainaR. and LandaE.2013. Depth migration in the offset‐aperture domain: optimal summation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3866–3871.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HarlanW.S., ClaerboutJ.F. and RoccaF.1984. Signal/noise separation and velocity estimation. Geophysics49, 1869–1880.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KhaidukovV., LandaE. and MoserT.J.2004. Diffraction imaging by focusing‐defocusing: an outlook on seismic superresolution. Geophysics69, 1478–1490.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KlokovA., BainaR. and LandaE.2010. Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions in dip angle domain. 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, G040.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KlokovA. and FomelS.2012. Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions using migrated dip‐angle gathers. Geophysics77, S131–S143.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LandaE.2013. Quantum Seismic Imaging: is it possible?Journal of Seismic Exploration22, 295–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LandaE., FomelS. and MoserT.J.2006. Path‐integral seismic imaging. Geophysical Prospecting54, 1365–2478.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LandaE., FomelS. and ReshefM.2008. Separation, imaging, and velocity analysis of seismic diffractions using migrated dip‐angle gathers. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2176–2180.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LandaE., ShtivelmanV. and GelchinskyB.1987. A method for detection of diffracted waves on common‐offset sections. Geophysical Prospecting35, 359–374.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MarfurtK.J., KirlinR.L., FarmerS.L. and BahorichM.S.1998. 3‐D seismic attributes using a semblance‐based coherency algorithm. Geophysics63, 1150–1165.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MoserT.J. and HowardC.B.2008Diffraction imaging in depth. Geophysical Prospecting56, 627–641.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. PharezS., JonesN., DirksV., ZimineS., PrigentH., IbbotsonK.et al. 2005. Prestack wave‐equation migration as a routine production tool. The Leading Edge, 24, 608–613.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. QinF., WangB., ZhangP. and AudebertF.2005. Kirchhoff PreSDM interactive dip‐gather stacking and dip illumination panel generation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1882–1885.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ReshefM. and LandaE.2009. Post‐stack velocity analysis in the dip‐angle domain using diffractions. Geophysical Prospecting57, 811–821.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ReshefM., LipzerN., DafniR. and LandaE.2012. 3D post‐stack interval velocity analysis with effective use of datuming. Geophysical Prospecting60, 18–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SavaP. and FomelS.2003. Angle‐domain common‐image gathers by wavefield continuation methods. Geophysics68, 1065–1074.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SavaP. and FomelS.2006. Time‐shift imaging condition in seismic migration. Geophysics71, S209–S217.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SchusterG.2002. Reverse‐time migration = generalized diffraction stack migration. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1280–1283.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SoubarasR.2003. Angle gathers for shot‐record migration by local harmonic decomposition. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 889–892.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. VyasM., NicholsD. and MobleyE.2011. Efficient RTM angle gathers using source directions. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3104–3108.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WangJ., NgM. and PerzM.2010. Seismic data interpolation by greedy local Radon transform. Geophysics75, WB225–WB234.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. XuS., ZhangY. and TangB.2011. 3D angle gathers from reverse time migration. Geophysics76, S77–S92.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ZhangM. and ZhanG.2013. Common‐image gathers in the offset domain from reverse time migration. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3762–3766.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ZhuX. and WuR.2010. Imaging diffraction points using the local image matrices generated in prestack migration. Geophysics75, S1–S9.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12280
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12280
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Diffractions; Reverse‐time migration; Seismic imaging

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error