1887
Volume 63 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Neves–Corvo is one of the biggest mining districts on the Portuguese side of the Iberian Pyrite Belt hosting six different lower Carboniferous copper, zinc, lead and tin orebodies including Lombador, Neves, Graça, Corvo, Zambujal, and Semblana. During the past 50 years, geological, geochemical, and geophysical methods were utilized in the exploration of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits at Neves–Corvo. Electromagnetic, earth resistivity, and principally gravimetry methods played major roles in the geophysical exploration of the area. However, in 2011, as the exploration depth for volcanogenic massive sulfide mineralization became ever deeper, the surface reflection seismic technique was trialled.

Initially, elastic property measurements were employed on numerous core samples to determine the seismic properties of the major formations of Neves–Corvo. The contrast in acoustic impedance values derived from these measurements showed that there should be a significant difference in the seismic response of mineralization relative to the surrounding host rocks. Based on this, a high‐resolution 3D seismic survey was acquired over the Neves–Corvo mine and its southeastern extension in order to image known deep volcanogenic massive sulfide mineralization to validate the seismic reflection technique and to potentially identify new mineralization targets. As a result, the Semblana and Lombador deposits were successfully imaged, along with key lithological contacts and geologic structures. Additionally, copper sulfide extensions south of Semblana were discovered. Unfortunately, all of the high‐priority targets that were identified from the seismic data were subsequently drilled and many of them found to be non‐economic.

In order to overcome the non‐uniqueness of the original seismic data, full‐waveform sonic and pseudo‐logs were used to model different interfaces and calibrate the seismic data. These results indicated that preserved relative amplitude processing might be of importance to help reduce the ambiguity in direct detection of volcanogenic massive sulfide based on seismic amplitude anomalies. The customized relative amplitude processing of a sub‐dataset over the Semblana deposit was then performed. The newly obtained seismic cube was calibrated with existing drillholes, and a volumetric interpretation was performed by utilizing amplitude‐based geobodies. Eventually, superior target zonation and precision for the subsequent deep drilling campaign was achieved with the revised interpretation, clearly showing that the high priority targets originally identified from the legacy data would not have passed the targeting criteria in the reprocessed data due to their relatively weak amplitude response. The results obtained from this study inspired the subsequent reprocessing of the full seismic dataset.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12269
2015-06-16
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BarrigaF.J.A.S., CarvalhoD. and RibeiroA.1997. Introduction to the Iberian Pyrite Belt: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series 27, pp. 1–20. Society of Economic Geologists.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BehrensR.A., MacLeodM.K., TranT.T. and AlimiA.C.1998. Incorporating seismic attribute maps in 3D reservoir models. Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering1, 122–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CarvalhoD., BarrigaF. and MunháJ.1999. Bimodal‐siliciclastic systems—the case of the Iberian Pyrite Belt, in Volcanic‐associated massive sulfide deposits: processes and examples in modern and ancient settings . Society of Economic Geologists, Reviews in Economic Geology, 375–408.
  4. ConnollyP.1998. Calibration and inversion of non‐zero offset seismic. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 182–184.
  5. DuchesneM.J. and GaillotP.2011. Did you smooth your well logs the right way for seismic interpretation? Journal of Geophysics and Engineering8, 514–523.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. EatonD.W., MilkereitB. and AdamE.1997. 3‐D seismic exploration. Proceedings of Exploration, 65–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. EatonD.W., MilkereitB. and SalisburyM.H.2003. Hardrock Seismic Exploration. SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GasparO. and PintoA.1991. The ore textures of the Neves–Corvo volcanogenic massive sulphides and their implications for ore beneficiation. Mineralogical Magazine55, 417–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HarrisonC.B.2009. Feasibility of rock characterization for mineral exploration using seismic data. PhD Thesis, Curtin University.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LeistelJ.M., MarcouxE., ThiéblemontD., QuesadaC., SánchezA., AlmodóvarG.R.et al. 1998. The volcanic‐hosted massive sulphide deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt review and preface to the thematic issue. Mineralium Deposita33, 2–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lundin Mining
    Lundin Mining2013. Neves–Corvo Summary Report, pp. 1–8. Lundin Mining Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MalehmirA., AnderssonM., LebedevM., UrosevicM. and MikhaltsevitchV.2013. Experimental estimation of velocities and anisotropy of a series of Swedish crystalline rocks and ores. Geophysical prospecting61, 153–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MalehmirA., DurrheimR., BellefleurG., UrosevicM., JuhlinC., WhiteD.et al. 2012. Seismic methods in mineral exploration and mine planning: A general overview of past and present case histories and a look into the future. Geophysics77, WC173–WC190.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MeyerL. and OwenM.L.2013. NI 43–101Technical Report for Neves–Corvo Mine and Semblana Deposit, Portugal: Wardell Armstrong International, Report Nr: MM779, pp. 1–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MilkereitB., BerrerE., KingA., WattsA., RobertsB., AdamE.et al. 2000. Development of 3‐D seismic exploration technology for deep nickel‐copper deposits—A case history from the Sudbury basin, Canada. Geophysics65, 1890–1899.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MilkereitB., EatonD., WuJ., PerronG., SalisburyM.H., BerrerE.K.et al. 1996. Seismic imaging of massive sulfide deposits; Part II, Reflection seismic profiling. Economic Geology91, 829–834.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. NabighianM. and AstenM.2002. Metalliferous mining geophysics—State of the art in the last decade of the 20th century and the beginning of the new millennium. Geophysics67, 964–978.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. O'DohertyR. F. and AnsteyN. A.1971. Reflections on Amplitudes*. Geophysical Prospecting19(3), 430–458.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. OliveiraJ.T., PachecoN., CarvalhoP. and FerreiraA.1997. The Neves Corvo Mine and the Paleozoic geology of Southwest Portugal. In: Geology and VMS deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series 27 (eds F.Barriga and DCarvalho ), pp 21–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. OliveiraJ.T., PereiraZ., CarvalhoP., PachecoN. and KornD.2004. Stratigraphy of the tectonically imbricated lithological succession of the Neves Corvo mine area, Iberian Pyrite Belt, Portugal. Mineralium Deposita39, 422–436.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. RelvasJ.M., BarrigaF.J., FerreiraA., NoivaP.C., PachecoN. and BarrigaG.2006. Hydrothermal alteration and mineralization in the Neves–Corvo volcanic‐hosted massive sulfide deposit, Portugal. I. Geology, mineralogy, and geochemistry. Economic Geology101, 753–790.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RosaC.J.P., McPhieJ., RelvasJ.M.R.S., PereiraZ., OliveiraT. and PachecoN.2008. Facies analyses and volcanic setting of the giant Neves Corvo massive sulfide deposit, Iberian Pyrite Belt, Portugal. Mineralium Deposita43, 449–466.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SáezR., AlmodóvarG.R. and PascualE.1996. Geological constraints on massive sulphide genesis in the Iberian Pyrite Belt. Ore Geology Reviews11, 429–451.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SalisburyM. H., MilkereitB., AscoughG., AdairR., MatthewsL., SchmittD. R., MwenifumboJ., EatonD. W. and WuJ. J., 2000. Physical properties and seismic imaging of massive sulfides. Geophysics65(6), 1882–1889.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SchermerhornL. and StantonW.1969. Folded overthrusts at Aljustrel (South Portugal). Geological Magazine106, 130–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. StraussG., MadelJ. and AlonsoF.F.1977. Exploration practice for strata‐bound volcanogenic sulphide deposits in the Spanish–Portuguese pyrite belt: Geology, geophysics, and geochemistry, In: Time and Strata‐Bound Ore Deposits, pp. 55–93. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. TanerM.T. and KoehlerF.1981. Surface Consistent Corrections. Geophysics46, 17–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. TornosF.2006. Environment of formation and styles of volcanogenic massive sulfides: The Iberian Pyrite Belt. Ore Geology Reviews28, 259–307.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. UrosevicM., BhatG. and GrochauM.H.2012. Targeting nickel sulfide deposits from 3D seismic reflection data at Kambalda, Australia. Geophysics77, WC123–WC132.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. YilmazO.2001. Seismic data analysis: Processing, inversion, and interpretation of seismic data: SEG, SEG Investigations in Geophysics, 10.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12269
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12269
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 3D seismic; Massive sulfide; Preserved relative amplitudes; Rock properties

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error