1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 64, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 64, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The increased application of airborne electromagnetic surveys to hydrogeological studies is driving a demand for data that can consistently be inverted for accurate subsurface resistivity structure from the near surface to depths of several hundred metres. We present an evaluation of three commercial airborne electromagnetic systems over two test blocks in western Nebraska, USA. The selected test blocks are representative of shallow and deep alluvial aquifer systems with low groundwater salinity and an electrically conductive base of aquifer. The aquifer units show significant lithologic heterogeneity and include both modern and ancient river systems. We compared the various data sets to one another and inverted resistivity models to borehole lithology and to ground geophysical models. We find distinct differences among the airborne electromagnetic systems as regards the spatial resolution of models, the depth of investigation, and the ability to recover near‐surface resistivity variations. We further identify systematic biases in some data sets, which we attribute to incomplete or inexact calibration or compensation procedures.

© 2015 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2015 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12262
2015-12-15
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12262
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarhus Geophysics . 2010. Processing and inversion of SkyTEM data – area UTM 13, 73 pp.
  2. AbrahamJ.D., CanniaJ.C., BedrosianP.A., JohnsonM.R., BallL.B. and SibrayS.S.2012. Airborne electromagnetic mapping of the base of aquifer in areas of western Nebraska. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5219, 38 pp.
  3. Aeroquest Surveys . 2009. Report on a Helicopter‐Borne AeroTEM System Electromagnetic and Magnetic Survey – North Platte and Sandhills Project 08–041, 36 pp.
  4. AukenE. and ChristiansenA.V.2004. Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data. Geophysics69, 752–761.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. AukenE., ChristiansenA.V., JacobsenB.H., FogedN. and SørensenK.I.2005. Piecewise 1D laterally constrained inversion of resistivity data. Geophysical Prospecting53, 497–506.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. AukenE. and NebelK.2001. Getting started with SiTEM and SEMDI. Aarhus University, 21 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BalchS.J., BoykoW.P. and PatersonN.R.2003. The AeroTEM airborne electromagnetic system. The Leading Edge22, 562–566.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BedrosianP.A., BallL.B. and BlossB.R.2014. Airborne electromagnetic data and processing within Leach Lake Basin, Fort Irwin, California. In: Geology and Geophysics Applied to Groundwater Hydrology at Fort Irwin, California, Chap. G (ed D.C.Buesch). U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2013–1024, 20 pp., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20131024G.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. BrodieR. and SambridgeM.2006. A holistic approach to inversion of frequency‐domain airborne EM data. Geophysics71, G301–G312.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. BrodieR.C., GreenA.G. and MundayT.2004. Constrained inversion of helicopter AEM data for mapping the Blanchetown Clay. Paper presented at the 17th ASEG meeting, Sydney, Australia, 5 pp.
  11. CanniaJ.C., WoodwardD. and CastL.D.2006. Cooperative Hydrology Study COHYST Hydrostratigraphic Units and Aquifer Characterization Report, 126 pp.
  12. ChristiansenA.V. and AukenE.2012. A global measure for depth of investigation. Geophysics77, WB171–WB177.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. ChristiansenA.V., AukenE. and ViezzoliA.2011. Quantification of modeling errors in airborne TEM caused by inaccurate system description. Geophysics76, F43–F52.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ConstableS.C., ParkerR.L. and ConstableC.G.1987. Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics52, 289–300.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. CunionE.2009. Comparison of ground TEM and VTEM responses over kimberlites in the Kalahari of Botswana. Paper presented at the 20th ASEG meeting, Adelaide, Australia, 6 pp.
  16. DavisL.J. and GroomR.W.2010. A comparison of airborne and ground electromagnetic data near the Grand Canyon, 45 pp.
  17. Day‐LewisF.D. and LaneJ.W.2004. Assessing the resolution‐dependent utility of tomograms for geostatistics. Geophysical Research Letters31, doi:10.1029/2004GL019617.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Deszcz‐PanM., FittermanD.V. and LabsonV.F.1998. Reduction of inversion errors in helicopter EM data using auxiliary information. Exploration Geophysics29, 142–146.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. DickinsonJ.E., PoolD.R., GroomR.W. and DavisL.J.2010. Inference of lithologic distributions in an alluvial aquifer using airborne transient electromagnetic surveys. Geophysics75, WA149–WA161.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. DiffendalR.F.1991. Geologic map showing configuration of the bedrock surface, North Platte 1 degree by 2 degrees Quadrangle, Nebraska. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I‐2277.
  21. FinnC.A., Deszcz‐PanM. and BedrosianP.A.2012. Helicopter electromagnetic data map ice thickness at Mount Adams and Mount Baker, Washington, USA. Journal of Glaciology58, 1433–1443, doi: 10.3189/2012JoG11J098.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. FischerB.C., KollaschK.M. and McGuireV.L.2000. Digital map of saturated thickness in the High Plains Aquifer in Parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming, 1996 to 1997. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2000–0300.
  23. FogedN., AukenE., ChristiansenA.V. and SørensenK.I.2013. Test‐site calibration and validation of airborne and ground‐based TEM systems. Geophysics78, E95–E106.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Fugro Airborne Surveys . 2008. Resolve survey for North Platte Resource District – North Platte River, Lodgepole Creek, and Sidney Draw areas, Western Nebraska. 8035, 92 pp.
  25. Fugro Airborne Surveys . 2009. Resolve survey for Sidney test area, Sidney, Nebraska. 09018, 68 pp.
  26. GreenA., BrodieR. and MundayT.2004. Interpretation of helicopter AEM data from the Riverland area, SA. Paper presented at the 17th ASEG meeting, Sydney, Australia, 4 pp.
  27. GutentagE.D., HeimesF.J., KrotheN.C., LuckeyR.R. and WeeksJ.B.1984. Geohydrology of the High Plains Aquifer in parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1400‐B, 63 pp.
  28. HobzaC.M., BedrosianP.A. and BlossB.R.2012. Hydrostratigraphic interpretation of test‐hole and surface geophysical data, Elkhorn and Loup River Basins, Nebraska, 2008 to 2011. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2012–1227, 95 pp.
  29. HodgesG. and BeattieD.2007. Comparison of HeliGeoTEM II and Dighem V over the Maimon massive sulphide deposit. Paper presented at the 10th SAGA meeting, Wild Coast, South Africa, 4 pp.
  30. Ley‐CooperY. and MacnaeJ.2007. Amplitude and phase correction of helicopter EM data. Geophysics72, F119–F126.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. McGuireV.L., LundK.D. and DensmoreB.K.2012. Saturated thickness and water in storage in the High Plains Aquifer, 2009, and water‐level changes and changes in water in storage in the High Plains Aquifer, 1980 to 1995, 1995 to 2000, 2000 to 2005, and 2005 to 2009. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5177, 28 pp.
  32. MinsleyB.J., SmithB.D., HammackR., SamsJ.I. and VeloskiG.2012. Calibration and filtering strategies for frequency domain electromagnetic data. Journal of Applied Geophysics80, 56–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Nebraska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission . Well data including formation tops. Available from: http://www.nogcc.ne.gov/NOGCCPublications.aspx (Accessed 3 October 2014).
  34. PodgorskiJ., AukenE., SchamperC., ChristiansenA.V., KalscheuerT. and GreenA.G.2013. Processing and inversion of commercial helicopter time‐domain electromagnetic data for environmental assessments and geological and hydrological mapping. Geophysics78, E149–E159.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. ReidJ.E. and VrbancichJ.2004. A comparison of the inductive‐limit footprints of airborne electromagnetic configurations. Geophysics69, 1229–1239.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. SchamperC., AukenE. and SørensenK.I.2014. Coil response inversion for very early time modeling of helicopter‐borne time‐domain EM data and mapping of near‐surface geological layers. Geophysical Prospecting62, 658–674.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. SkyTEM Surveys Aps . 2010. SkyTEM Survey: Nebraska, USA Data Report, 42 pp.
  38. SmithB.D., AbrahamJ.D., CanniaJ.C. and HillP.2009. Helicopter electromagnetic and magnetic geophysical survey data for portions of the North Platte River and Lodgepole Creek, Nebraska, June 2008. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2009–1110, 34 pp.
  39. SmithB.D., AbrahamJ.D., CanniaJ.C., MinsleyB.J., Deszcz‐PanM. and BallL.B.2010. Helicopter electromagnetic and magnetic geophysical survey data, portions of the North Platte and South Platte Natural Resources Districts, western Nebraska, May 2009. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2010–1259, 33 pp.
  40. SmithR.S., AnnanA.P. and McGowanP.D.2001. A comparison of data from airborne, semi‐airborne, and ground electromagnetic systems. Geophysics66, 1379–1386.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. SmithR.S., KochR., HodgesG. and LemieuxJ.2011. A comparison of airborne electromagnetic data with ground resistivity data over the Midwest deposit in the Athabasca basin. Near Surface Geophysics9, 319–330.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. SørensenK.I. and AukenE.2004. SkyTEM—A new high‐resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics35, 191–199.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. SteeleG.V., SibrayS.S. and QuandtK.A.2007. Evaluation of ground water near Sidney, western Nebraska, 2004–05. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5086, 54 pp.
  44. SteinM.L.1999. Interpolation of Spatial Data – Some Theory for Kriging. Springer. ISBN: 9781461214946.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. SteuerA., SiemonB. and AukenE.2009. A comparison of helicopter‐borne electromagnetics in frequency‐ and time‐domain at the Cuxhaven valley in Northern Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics67, 194–205.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. SwinehartJ.B. and DiffendalR.F.1998. Geology. In: An Atlas of the Sand Hills (eds A.S.Bleed and C.Flowerday), pp. 29–42. University of Nebraska‐Lincoln. ISBN: 9781561610020.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. SwinehartJ.B., SoudersV.L., DeGrawH.M. and DiffendalR.F.1985. Cenozoic paleogeography of western Nebraska. In: Cenozoic Paleogeography of West‐Central United States (eds R.M.Flores and S.S.Kaplan), pp. 209–229. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists. ISBN: 9789990706086.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Conservation and Survey Division . Test hole database. Available from: http://snr.unl.edu/data/geologysoils/NebraskaTestHole/NebraskaTestHoleIntro.asp (Accessed 3 October 2013).
  49. VerstraetenI.M., SteeleG.V., CanniaJ.C., HitchD.E., ScripterK.G., BohlkeJ.K.et al. 2001. Interaction of surface water and ground water in the Dutch Flats area, western Nebraska, 1995–99. U.S. Geological Survey Water Investigations Report 2001–4070, 56 pp.
  50. ViezzoliA., ChristiansenA.V., AukenE. and SørensenK.2008. Quasi‐3D modeling of airborne TEM data by spatially constrained inversion. Geophysics73, F105–F113.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. ViezzoliA., JørgensenF. and SørensenC.2013. Flawed processing of airborne EM data affecting hydrogeological interpretation. Groundwater51, 191–202.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. ViezzoliA., MundayT. and CooperY.L.2012. Airborne electromagnetics for groundwater salinity mapping: case studies of coastal and inland salinisation from around the world. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata53, 581–600.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12262
Loading
A comparison of helicopter‐borne electromagnetic systems for hydrogeologic studies
Geophysical Prospecting 64, 192 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12262
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12262
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12262
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Airborne electromagnetic; Ground water; Inversion

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error