Ground‐penetrating radar evaluation of the ancient Mycenaean monument Tholos Acharnon tomb

References

1. AriasP., ArmestoJ., Di‐CapuaD., Gonzalez‐DrigoR., LorenzoH. and Perez‐GraciaV.2007. Digital photogrammetry, GPR and computational analysis of structural damages in a mediaeval bridge. Engineering Failure Analysis14, 1444–1457.
   [Google Scholar]
2. CaliaA., Lettierim., LeucciG., MateraL., PersicoR. and Sileom.2007. Journal of Archaeological Science40, 4162–4169.
   [Google Scholar]
3. CampJ.M.2004. The Archaeology of Athens. Yale University Press, London, U.K.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ConyersL. and GoodmanD.1997. Ground‐Penetrating Radar: An Introduction for Archaeologists, pp. 232. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ConyersL. and LeckebuschJ.2010. Geophysical archaeology research agendas for the future: some ground‐penetrating radar examples. Archaeological Prospection17, 117–123.
   [Google Scholar]
6. FaizeA. and DriouachA.2012. The use of ground penetrating radar for the detection and study of a buried marble and in situ location of possible cracks. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications2(4), 1036–1039.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Geophysical Geometry Laboratory
   Geophysical Geometry Laboratory . 2014. GPR‐SLICE V7.0 Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging Software User’s Manual, CA, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hertrichm., Braunm. and YaramanciU.2005, Magnetic resonance soundings with separated transmitter and receiver loops. Near Surface Geophysics3, 141–154.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HrnskaJ. and FuchsG.1999. GPR prospection in ancient Ephesos. Journal of Applied Geophysics41, 293–312
   [Google Scholar]
10. LeucciG., CataldoR. and De NunzioG.2007. Assessment of fractures in some columns inside the crypt of the Cattedrale di Otranto using integrated geophysical methods. Journal of Archaeological Science34, 222–232.
    [Google Scholar]
11. NeubauerW., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., SerenS. and MelicharP.2002. Georadar in the roman civil town carnuntum, austria: an approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Archaeological Prospection9, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Perez‐GraciaV., CanasJ.A., PujadesL.G., ClapesJ., CasellesO., GarcíaF. et al. 2000. GPR survey to confirm the location of ancient structures under the Valencian Cathedral (Spain). Journal of Applied Geophysics43, 167–174.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Perez‐GraciaV., Di CapuaD., CasellesO., RialF., LorenzoH., González‐DrigoR. et al. 2011. Characterization of a Romanesque Bridge in Galicia (Spain). International Journal of Architectural Heritage5(3), 251–263.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Pérez‐GraciaV., GarcíaF., PujadesL.G., González‐DrigoR. and Di CapuaD.2008. GPR survey to study the restoration of a Roman monument. Journal of Cultural Heritage9, 89–96.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Perez‐GraciaV., González‐DrigoR. and SalaR.2012. Ground‐penetrating radar resolution in cultural heritage applications. Near Surface Geophysics10, 77–87.
    [Google Scholar]
16. RainerJ.H.1982. Effect of Vibrations on Historic Buildings: An Overview. Bulletin of the Association for Preservation Technology14(1), 2–10.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Santos‐AssunçaoS.2014. Ground Penetrating Radar Applications in Seismic Zonation: Assessment and Evaluation. PhD thesis, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona‐Tech, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Santos‐AssunçaoS., Perez‐GraciaV., CasellesO., ClapesJ. and SalinasV.2014. Assessment of complex masonry structures with GPR compared to other non‐destructive testing studies. Remote Sensing6, 8220–8237.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sollam., LorenzoH., RialF.I. and NovoA.2011. GPR evaluation of the Roman masonry arch bridge of Lugo (Spain). NDT&E International44, 8–12.
    [Google Scholar]
20. TrinksI., JohanssonB., GustafssonJ., EmilssonJ., FriborgJ., GustafssonC. et al. 2010. Efficient, large‐scale archaeological prospection using a true three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating Radar Array system. Archaeological Prospection17(3), 175–186.
    [Google Scholar]