1887
Volume 64, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A marine source generates both a direct wavefield and a ghost wavefield. This is caused by the strong surface reflectivity, resulting in a source array, the blending process being natural. The two unblended response wavefields correspond to the real source at the actual location below the water level and to the ghost source at the mirrored location above the water level. As a consequence, deghosting becomes deblending (‘echo‐deblending’) and can be carried out with a deblending algorithm. In this paper we present source deghosting by an iterative deblending algorithm that properly includes the angle dependence of the ghost: It represents a closed‐loop, solution. The proposed echo‐deblending algorithm is also applied to the detector deghosting problem. The detector cable may be slanted, and shot records may be generated by blended source arrays, the blending being created by simultaneous sources. Similar to surface‐related multiple elimination the method is independent of the complexity of the subsurface; only what happens at and near the surface is relevant. This means that the actual sea state may cause the reflection coefficient to become frequency dependent, and the water velocity may not be constant due to temporal and lateral variations in the pressure, temperature, and salinity. As a consequence, we propose that estimation of the actual ghost model should be part of the echo‐deblending algorithm. This is particularly true for source deghosting, where interaction of the source wavefield with the surface may be far from linear. The echo‐deblending theory also shows how multi‐level source acquisition and multi‐level streamer acquisition can be numerically simulated from standard acquisition data. The simulated multi‐level measurements increase the performance of the echo‐deblending process. The output of the echo‐deblending algorithm on the source side consists of two ghost‐free records: one generated by the real source at the actual location below the water level and one generated by the ghost source at the mirrored location above the water level. If we apply our algorithm at the detector side as well, we end up with four ghost‐free shot records. All these records are input to migration. Finally, we demonstrate that the proposed echo‐deblending algorithm is robust for background noise.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12293
2015-07-29
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AmundsenL. and ZhouH.2013. Low‐frequency seismic deghosting. Geophysics78, WA15–WA20.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AmundsenL., ZhouH., ReitanA. and WegleinA.B.2013. On seismic deghosting by spatial deconvolution. Geophysics78, V267–V271.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BeasleyC.J., ChambersR.E. and JiangZ.1998. A new look at simultaneous sources. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts17(1), 133–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BeasleyC.J., CoatesR., JiY. and PerdomoJ.2013. Wave equation receiver deghosting: a provocative example. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts32(1), 4226–4230.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BerkhoutA.J.1982. Seismic Migration: Imaging of Acoustic Energy By Wave Field Extrapolation A. Theoretical Aspects. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BerkhoutA.J.2008. Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition. The Leading Edge27(7), 924–938.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BerkhoutA.J. and BlacquièreG.2013. Effect of noise in blending and deblending. Geophysics78(5), A35–A38.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BerkhoutA.J. and BlacquièreG.2014. Combining deblending with multi‐level source deghosting. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts41–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CaprioliP., ÖzdemirK., ÖzbekA., KraghJ., van ManenD., ChristieP. and RobertssonJ.2012. Combination of multi‐component streamer pressure and vertical particle velocity theory and application to data. EAGE 74th Annual International Conference and Exhibition, A033.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DoulgerisP., BubeK., HampsonG. and BlacquièreG.2012. Convergence analysis of a coherency‐constrained inversion for the separation of blended data. Geophysical Prospecting60(4), 769–781.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. FerberR. and BeasleyC.J.2014. Simulating ultra‐deep‐tow marine seismic data for receiver deghosting. 76th EAGE Annual International Conference and Exhibition.
  12. FerberR., CaprioliP. and WestL.2013. L1 pseudo‐vz estimation and deghosting of single‐component marine towed‐streamer data. Geophysics78(2), WA21–WA26.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HopperstadJ.F., LawsR. and KraghE.2008. Fundamental principles of isotropic marine source design. 70th EAGE Annual International Conference and Exhibition, B025.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LeroyC.C., RobinsonS.P. and GoldsmithM.J.2008. A new equation for the accuracte calculation of sound speed in all oceans. Journal of Acoustical Society of America124(5), 2774–2782.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LetkiL.P. and SpjuthC.2014. Quantification of wavefield reconstruction quality from multisensor streamer data using a witness streamer experiment. 76th EAGE Annual International Conference and Exhibition.
  16. MahdadA., DoulgerisP. and BlacquiéreG.2011. Separation of blended data by iterative estimation and subtraction of blending interference noise. Geophysics76(3), Q9–Q17.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MayhanJ.D. and WegleinA.B.2013. First application of greens theorem‐derived source and receiver deghosting on deep‐water gulf of mexico synthetic (seam) and field data. Geophysics78(2), WA77–WA89.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MoldoveanuN.2000. Vertical source array in marine seismic exploration. 2000 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 53–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MonkD.J.1990. Wavefield separation of twin streamer data. First Break8, 96–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. OrjiO.C., SollnerW. and GeliusL.J.2013. Sea surface reflection coefficient estimation. 2013 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 51–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. RobertssonJ.O.A., AmundsenL. and PedersenO.2014. Deghosting of arbitrarily depth‐varying marine hydrophone streamer data by time‐space domain modelling. 2014 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 4248–4252.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SønnelandL., BergL.E., EidsvigP., HaugenA., FotlandB. and VestbyJ.1986. 2D deghosting using vertical receiver arrays. 1986 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 516–519.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SoubarasR.2010. Deghosting by joint deconvolution of a migration and a mirror migration. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts29(1), 3406–3410.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. TenghamnR., VaageS. and BorresenC.A dual sensor towed marine streamer: Its viable implementation and initial results. 2007 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 989–993.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. WalkerC., MonkD. and HaysD.2014. Blended source—the future of ocean bottom seismic acquisition. 76th EAGE Annual International Meeting.
  26. WangP. and PengC.2012. Premigration deghosting for marine towed streamer data using a bootstrap approach. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts31, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WegleinA.B. and ZhangJ.2005. Extinction theorem deghosting method using towed streamer pressure data: Analysis of the receiver array effect on deghosting and subsequent free surface multiple removal. 75th SEG Annual International Meeting, 2095–2098.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12293
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12293
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Data processing; Deblending; Deghosting; Mathematical formulation; Signal processing

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error