1887

Abstract

Summary

The aim of this work is to present a Matlab interface called VEMI (Versatile interface for Electrical data Modelling and Inversion) included in the EIDORS package. The interface is able to invert 2D and 3D electrical data acquired in the time- or in the frequency-domain, both for cylindrical and prismatic geometries. Therefore it can be applied for inversion of both real and complex-valued resistivity tomography data. Application to laboratory and field data are discussed.

The 3D laboratory example, consisting in a simulation of a shallow aquifer contaminated by a DNAPL, demonstrated the reliability of the interface to detect the DNAPL pathway within the physical model, through the analysis of the inverted phase model.

The results of the 3D inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data acquired on a masonry building were compared with those obtained a common used commercial software. Although both software were able to detect the high-resistivity zone associated with the presence of the foundation wall, the resistivity values and the shape of the anomaly shown by the VEMI inverted model are more similar to those expected for this construction element.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413789
2015-09-06
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adler, A. and Lionheart, W.
    [2006] Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT. Physiological Measurement, 27, 25–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cardarelli, E. and Fischanger, F.
    [2006] 2D data modelling by electrical resistivity tomography for complex subsurface geology. Geophysical Prospecting, 54, 121–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng, K.S., Isaacson, D. and Gisser, J.N.D.
    [1989] Electrode model for electric current computed tomography. IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, 36, 918–924.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Donno, G.
    [2013] 2D tomographic inversion of complex resistivity data on cylindrical models. Geophysical Prospecting, 61(Suppl.1), 586–601.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Donno, G. and Cardarelli, E.
    [2014] 3D complex resistivity tomography on cylindrical models using EIDORS. Near Surface Geophysics, 12(5), 587–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Flores Orozco, A., Williams, K.H., Long, P.E., Hubbard, S.S. and Kemna, A.
    [2011] Using complex resistivity imaging to infer biogeochemical processes associated with bioremediation of an uranium-contaminated aquifer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences (2005–2012), 116(G3).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kemna, A., Binley, A., Ramirez, A. and Daily, W.
    [2000] Complex resistivity tomography for environmental applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 77, 11–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Loke, M.H. and Barker, R.D.
    [1996] Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting, 44(1), 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pidlisecky, A., Haber, E. and Knight, R.
    [2007] RESINVM3D: A 3D resistivity inversion package. Geophysics, 72(2), H1–H10.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wolke, R. and Schwetlick, H.
    [1998] Iteratively reweighted least squares: algorithms, convergence analysis and numerical comparisons. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 9, 907–921.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413789
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413789
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error