1887

Abstract

Summary

Since its introduction in the oil and gas industry, amplitude versus angle (AVA) inversion has become a standard tool in hydrocarbon exploration. However, with the intensification of off-shore construction activity, applications of this method have also been extended to evaluate the elastic properties of seabed sediments. These sediments are often undercompated and characterized by very low Vs and high Vp/Vs ratios. The importance of Vp/Vs ratios is usually underrated in AVA inversion which is often applied with few misgivings in case of high Vp/Vs ratios. In this work, we derive the elastic properties of the seabed interface by applying AVA inversion to a 2D well-site survey acquisition. The limited water depth, the maximum offset of the seismic acquisition and the high frequency content of the data make it possible to consider two different ranges of incidence angles: 0-30 and 0-60 degrees. The limits of AVA inversion in case of high Vp/Vs ratios are discussed together with the benefits introduced by wide angle reflections in constraining the inversion. In particular, these reflections are essential to decrease both the cross-talk between the inverted parameters and the uncertainties in the Vp and density estimations, but they do not guarantee a reliable Vs estimation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413803
2015-09-06
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K., and Richards, P.G.
    [1980] Quantitative seismology: Theory and methods. WH Freeman and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aleardi, M.
    [2015] The importance of the Vp/Vs ratio in determining the error propagation, the stability and the resolution of linear AVA inversion: a theoretical demonstration. Bollettino di Geofísica Teorica e Applicata. In print.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aster, R.C., Borchers, B. and Thurber, C.H.
    [2005] Parameter estimation and inverse problems. Elsevier Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Drufuca, G. and Mazzotti, A.
    [1995] Ambiguities in AVO inversion of reflections from a gas-sand. Geophysics, 60(1), 134–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grion, S., Mazzotti, A. and Spagnolini, U.
    [1998]. Joint estimation of AVO and kinematic parameters. Geophysical Prospecting, 46, 405–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ostrander, W.
    [1984] Plane-wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at non-normal angles of incidence. Geophysics, 49(10), 1637–1648.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Riedel, M. and Theilen, F.
    [2001] AVO investigations of shallow marine sediments. Geophysical Prospecting, 49(2), 198–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Rutherford, S.R. and Williams, R.H.
    [1989] Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas sands. Geophysics, 54(6), 680–688.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413803
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413803
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error