Comparison between 1D Inversion of Geophilus Data and 2D Inversion of Wenner Array Data

References

1. Constable, S.C., Parker, R.L. and Constable, C.G.
   [1987] Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics, 52, 289–300
   [Google Scholar]
2. Corwin, D.L. and Lesch, S.M.
   [2005] Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 46, 11–43
   [Google Scholar]
3. Guillemoteau, J. and Tronicke, J.
   [2015] Non-standard electromagnetic induction sensor configurations: evaluating sensitivities and applicability. Journal of Applied Geophysics, in Press, doi:10.1016/Uappqeo.2015.04.008.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/Uappqeo.2015.04.008 [Google Scholar]
4. Guillemoteau, J., Sailhac, P., Boulanger, C. and Trules, J.
   [2015] Inversion of ground constant offset loop-loop electromagnetic data for a large range of induction numbers. Geophysics, 80, E11–E21.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Loke, M.H. and Barker, R.D.
   [1996] Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting, 44, 131–152
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lück, E. and Ruehlmann, J.
   [2013] Resistivity mapping with GEOPHILUS ELECTRICUS-Information about lateral and vertical soil heterogeneity. Geoderma, 199, 2–11
   [Google Scholar]
7. Panissod, C., Dabas, M., Jolivat, A., Tabbagh, A.
   [1997] A novel mobile multipole system (MUCEP) for shallow (0–3 m) geoelectrical investigation: the ‘vol-de-canard’ array. Geophysical Prospecting, 45, 983–1002
   [Google Scholar]
8. Sudduth, K.A., Kitchen, N.R., Bollero, G.A., Bullock, D.G. and Wiebold, W.J.
   [2003] Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct sensing of soil electrical conductivity: Agronomy Journal, 95, 472–482
   [Google Scholar]
9. Zhdanov, M.S.
   [2009] Geophysical electromagnetic theory and methods. Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]