1887
Volume 13 Number 5
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Anisotropic effects have been widely considered in seismic subsurface imaging but rarely for the near‐surface area. The near‐surface area is often assumed isotropic. Seismic refraction methods are often applied to infer a shallow velocity model, either for making static corrections or for building the top portion of a pre‐stack depth migration velocity model. To study the anisotropic effects on the refractions and the near‐surface imaging results, we design numerical models with horizontal‐transverse‐isotropy anisotropic parameters assigned in the shallow layers and perform three‐dimensional seismic ray‐tracing with the consideration of horizontal‐transverse‐isotropy anisotropy to calculate the first‐arrival travel times. Then, we assume the near‐surface area “isotropic” and invert a near‐surface velocity model using isotropic travel‐time tomography. Through these tests, we have identified that the footprints of the recording geometry could be mapped into the velocity model, and high‐velocity anomalies are produced right above the refractor if the horizontal‐transverse‐isotropy anisotropy is ignored. By applying the azimuth‐dependent travel‐time tomography, we could account for anisotropic effects and infer the fast and slow velocity models to determine the direction of the symmetry axis. With the same approach, we process a three‐dimensional real data set, and the results are consistent with the local geology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015035
2015-07-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BaiC., GreenhalghS. and ZhouB.2007. 3D ray tracing using a modified shortest‐path method [J]. Geophysics72(4), T27–T36.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CardarelliE.2002. Ray tracing in elliptical anisotropic media using the linear traveltime interpolation (LTI) method applied to traveltime seismic tomography. Geophysical Prospecting50(1), 55–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CervenyV.1972. Seismic rays and ray intensities in inhomogeneous anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International29(1), 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CervenyV. and FirbasP.1984. Numerical modeling and inversion of travel times of seismic body waves in inhomogenous anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International76(1), 41–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChapmanC.H. and PrattR.G.1992. Traveltime tomography in anisotropic media‐I. Theory. Geophysical Journal International109(1), 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CrampinS.1987. The geological and industrial implications of extensive dilatancy anisotropy. Nature328, 491–496.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HelbigK. and ThomsenL.2005. 75–plus years of anisotropy in exploration and reservoir seismics: A historical review of concepts and methods. Geophysics70(6), 9ND–23ND.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. McCollumB. and SnellF.1932. Asymmetry of sound velocity in stratified formations. Physics (Journal of Applied Physics)2, 174–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MoserT.J.1991. Shortest path calculation of seismic rays. Geophysics56(1), 59–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PrattR.G., McGaugheyW.J. and ChapmanC.H.1993. Anisotropic velocity tomography: A case study in a near‐surface rock mass. Geophysics58(12), 1748–1763.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ShraggeJ.C. and SavaP.2005. Wave‐equation migration from topography. 75th SEG meeting, Houston, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1842–1845.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51(10), 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. TsvankinI.1997a. Reflection moveout and parameter estimation for horizontal transverse isotropy. Geophysics62(2), 614–629.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. TsvankinI.1997b. Moveout analysis for transversely isotropic media with a tilted symmetry axis. Geophysical Prospecting45, 479–512.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. TsvankinI., GaiserJ., GrechkaV., BaanM. and ThomsenL.2010. Seismic anisotropy in exploration and reservoir characterization: An overview. Geophysics75(5), 75A15–75A29.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WangX. and TsvankinI.2013. Ray‐based gridded tomography for tilted transversely isotropic media. Geophysics78(1), C11–C23.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. WhiteD.J.1989. Two‐dimensional seismic refraction tomography. Geophysical Journal International97(2), 223–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ZhangJ. and ToksozM.N.1998. Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography. Geophysics63(5), 1726–1737.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ZhangJ. and YilmazO.2005. Near‐surface corrections for complex structure imaging. 75th SEG meeting, Houston, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 2566–2568.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ZhouB. and GreenhalghS.A.2005. Shortest path ray tracing for the most general 2D/3D anisotropic media. Journal of Geophysical Engineering2, 54–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ZhouB., GreenhalghS. and GreenA.2008. Nonlinear traveltime inversion scheme for crosshole seismic tomography in tilted transversely isotropic media. Geophysics73(4), D17–D33.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ZhuT., CheadleS., PetrellaA. and GrayS.2000. First‐arrival tomography. Method and application. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary, Canada, Expanded Abstracts, 2028–2031.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ZhuX.2002. Velocity imaging through complex near‐surface structures by tomography. 64th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, Extended Abstracts, A27.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ZhuX., SixtaD.P. and AngstmanB.G.1992. Tomostatics: turning‐ray tomography+static corrections. The Leading Edge11(12), 15–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ZhuX., ValasekP., RoyB., ShawS., HowellJ., WhitneyS. et al. 2008. Recent applications of turning‐ray tomography. Geophysics73(5), VE243–VE254.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015035
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015035
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error