Optimized arrays for 2D resistivity surveys with combined surface and buried arrays

References

1. AukenE., PellerinL., ChristensenN.B. and SørensenK.2006. A survey of current trends in near‐surface electrical and electromagnetic methods. Geophysics71, G249–G260.
   [Google Scholar]
2. CarpenterE.W. and HabberjamG.M.1956. A tri‐potential method of resistivity prospecting. Geophysis11, 455–469.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ChambersJ.E., KurasO., MeldrumP.I., OgilvyR.O. and HollandsJ.2006. Electrical resistivity tomography applied to geologic, hydrogeologic, and engineering investigations at a former waste‐disposal site. Geophysics71, B231–B239.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ChambersJ.E., WilkinsonP.B., WealthallG.P., LokeM.H., DeardenR., WilsonR.et al.2010. Hydrogeophysical imaging of deposit heterogeneity and groundwater chemistry changes during DNAPL source zone bioremediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology118, 43–61.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CosciaI., MarescotL., MaurerH., GreenhalghS. and LindeN.2008. Experimental design for crosshole electrical resistivity tomography data sets. In: 14th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. EAGE.
   [Google Scholar]
6. DahlinT.1996. 2D resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering applications. First Break14, 275–284.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DanielsenB.E. and DahlinT.2010. Numerical modeling of resolution and sensitivity of ERT in horizontal boreholes. Journal of Applied Geophysics70, 245–254.
   [Google Scholar]
8. EllisR.G. and OldenburgD.W.1994. Applied geophysical inversion. Geophysical Journal International116, 5–11.
   [Google Scholar]
9. FarquharsonC.G. and OldenburgD.W.1998. Nonlinear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure. Geophysical Journal International134, 213–227.
   [Google Scholar]
10. FarquharsonC.G. and OldenburgD.W.2004. A comparison of automatic techniques for estimating the regularization parameter in non‐linear inverse problems. Geophysical Journal International156, 411–425.
    [Google Scholar]
11. FriedelS.2003. Resolution, stability and efficiency of resistivity tomography estimated from a generalized inverse approach. Geophysical Journal International153, 305–316.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GolubG.H. and van LoanC.F.1989. Matrix Computations, 2nd Edition.The John Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0801854148.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GriffithsD.H., TurnbullJ. and OlayinkaA.I.1990. Two‐dimensional resistivity mapping with a computer‐controlled array. First Break8, 121–129
    [Google Scholar]
14. HagreyS.A.2012. 2D optimized electrode arrays for borehole resistivity tomography and CO2 sequestration modelling. Pure and Applied Geophysics169, 1283–1292.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HagreyS.A. and PetersenT.2011. Numerical and experimental mapping of small root zones using optimized surface and borehole resistivity tomography. Geophysics76, G25–G35.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HarroD. and KruseS.2013. Improved imaging of covered karst with the multi‐electrode resistivity implant technique. In: 13th Sinkhole Conference, NCKRI Symposium 2, Carlsbad, New Mexico, pp. 7.
    [Google Scholar]
17. HorstR., PardalosP.M. and ThoaiN.V.2000. Introduction to Global Optimization, 2nd Edition.Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
18. KruseS., GrasmueckM., WeissM. and ViggianoD.2006. Sinkhole structure imaging in covered Karst terrain. Geophysical Research Letters33, L16405.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LaBrecqueD.J., MilettoM., DailyW., Ramirex, A. and OwenE.1996. The effects of noise on Occam’s inversion of resistivity tomography data. Geophysics61, 538–548.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996a. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi‐Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting44, 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996b. Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophysical Prospecting44, 499–523.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LokeM.H., AcworthI. and DahlinT.2003. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics34, 182–187.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LokeM.H., DahlinT. and RuckerD.F.2014a. Smoothness‐constrained time‐lapse inversion of data from 3‐D resistivity surveys. Near Surface Geophysics12, 5–24.
    [Google Scholar]
24. LokeM.H., WilkinsonP. and ChambersJ.2010a. Fast computation of optimized electrode arrays for 2D resistivity surveys. Computers & Geosciences36, 1414–1426.
    [Google Scholar]
25. LokeM.H., WilkinsonP. and ChambersJ.2010b. Parallel computation of optimized arrays for 2‐D electrical imaging. Geophysical Journal International183, 1202–1315.
    [Google Scholar]
26. LokeM.H., ChambersJ.E., RuckerD.F., KurasO. and WilkinsonP.B.2013. Recent developments in the direct‐current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics95, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LokeM.H., WilkinsonP., ChambersJ. and StruttM.2014b. Optimized arrays for 2‐D cross‐borehole electrical tomography surveys. Geophysical Prospecting62, 172–189.
    [Google Scholar]
28. LokeM.H., WilkinsonP.B., UhlemannS.S., ChambersJ.E. and OxbyL. S.2014c. Computation of optimized arrays for 3‐D electrical imaging surveys. Geophysical Journal International199, 1751–1764.
    [Google Scholar]
29. LokeM.H., WilkinsonP.B., ChambersJ.E., UhlemannS.S. and SorensenJ.P.R.2015. Optimized arrays for 2‐D resistivity survey lines with a large number of electrodes. Journal of Applied Geophysics112, 136–146.
    [Google Scholar]
30. MenkeW.1989. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory (Revised Edition).Academic Press Inc. IBSN 0124909213.
    [Google Scholar]
31. MillerC.R. and RouthP.S.2007. Resolution analysis of geophysical images: Comparison between point spread function and region of influence measures. Geophysical Prospecting55, 835–852.
    [Google Scholar]
32. NennaV., PidliseckyA. and KnightR.2011. Informed experimental design for electrical resistivity imaging. Near Surface Geophysics9, 469–482.
    [Google Scholar]
33. OldenborgerG.A. and RouthP.S.2009. The point‐spread function measure of resolution for the 3D electrical resistivity experiment. Geophysical Journal International176, 405–414.
    [Google Scholar]
34. PaascheH., WerbanU. and DietrichP.2009. Near‐surface seismic traveltime tomography using a direct‐push source and surface‐planted geophones. Geophysics7(4), G17–G25.
    [Google Scholar]
35. PowerC., GerhardJ.I., TsourlosP., SoupiosP., SimyrdanisK. and KaraoulisM.2015. Improved time‐lapse electrical resistivity tomography monitoring of dense non‐aqueous phase liquids with surface‐to‐horizontal borehole arrays. Journal of Applied Geophysics112, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
36. SasakiY.1992. Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation. Geophysical Prospecting40, 453–464.
    [Google Scholar]
37. SimyrdanisK., TsourlosP., PapadopoulosN. and SoupiosP.2014. Optimized Arrays for Surface‐to‐tunnel ERT Measurements. In: 20th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Athens, Greece, 14–18 September 2014, Tu PA1 02.
    [Google Scholar]
38. SlaterL., BinleyA.M., DailyW. and JohnsonR.2000. Cross‐hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. Journal of Applied Geophysics44, 85–102.
    [Google Scholar]
39. H.Palos
    StewartM. and ParkerJ.1992. Localization and seasonal variation of recharge in a covered karst aquifer system, Florida, USA. In: Hydrogeology of Selected Karst Regions: International Contributions to Hydrogeology Vol. 13 (eds H.Palos and W.Back ). International Association of Hydrogeologists.
    [Google Scholar]
40. StummerP., MaurerH. and GreenA.2004. Experimental design: Electrical resistivity datasets that provide optimum subsurface information. Geophysics69, 120–129.
    [Google Scholar]
41. United States Environmental Protection Agency
    United States Environmental Protection Agency . 1998. Geophysical techniques to locate DNAPLs: Profiles of federally funded projects, EPA 542‐R‐98‐020, pp. 31. Member Agencies of the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.
    [Google Scholar]
42. United States Environmental Protection Agency
    United States Environmental Protection Agency . 2005. Groundwater sampling and monitoring with direct push technologies, EPA 540/R‐04/005, pp. 78. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
    [Google Scholar]
43. WhiteR.M.S., CollinsS., DenneR., HeeR. and BrownP.2001. A new survey design for 3D IP modelling at Copper Hill. Exploration Geophysics32, 152–155.
    [Google Scholar]
44. WilkinsonP.B., ChambersJ.E., MeldrumP.I., OgilvyR.D. and CauntS.2006a. Optimization of array configurations and panel combinations for the detection and imaging of abandoned mineshafts using 3D cross‐hole electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics11, 213–221.
    [Google Scholar]
45. WilkinsonP.B., MeldrumP.I., ChambersJ.E., KurasO. and OgilvyR.D.2006b. Improved strategies for the automatic selection of optimized sets of electrical resistivity tomography measurement configurations. Geophysical Journal International167, 1119–1126.
    [Google Scholar]
46. WilkinsonP.B., ChambersJ.E., LelliottM., WealthallP. and OgilvyR.D.2008. Extreme sensitivity of crosshole electrical resistivity tomography measurements to geometric errors. Geophysical Journal International173, 49–62.
    [Google Scholar]
47. WilkinsonP.B., LokeM.H., MeldrumP.I., ChambersJ.E, KurasO., GunnD.A.et al.2012. Practical aspects of applied optimised survey design for Electrical Resistivity Tomography. Geophysical Journal International189, 428–440.
    [Google Scholar]
48. ZhouB. and DahlinT.2003. Properties and effects of measurement errors on 2D resistivity imaging surveying. Near Surface Geophysics1, 105–117.
    [Google Scholar]