1887

Abstract

Summary

The geophysical detection of the western EEP boundary at crustal depths, south of the junction with the Carpathian Mts, represents an important geotectonic information when improving regional crustal models. Such geophysical and tectonic models are of great value in SE Europe, where the Vrancea seismogenic zone is generating high magnitude earthquakes at crustal and intermediate depths.

Satellite and ground Gravity and Magnetic regional data are integrated and interpreted in view of a better understanding of the TESZ southern continuation and location of the western EEP boundary.

The integrated interpretation of both satellite and ground Gravity and Magnetic data offers detailed information on the western boundary of the East European Platform at continental or regional scales.

The interpretation of gravity stripped map of Romania illustrated the EEP western boundary at crystalline basement depth and at lithospheric depth, respectively.

Based on the satellite magnetic and the gravity stripped maps, the eastern part of the Moesian Platform is interpreted to have geophysical EEP affinities (high magnetic properties and higher density) than its western part, the Intramoesian Fault being considered as a regional tectonic contact.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414181
2015-10-05
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ioane, D. and Ion, D.
    [1992] Bouguer gravity anomaly map of Romania built on mean gravity values, scale 1: 1,000,000.Getech, Leeds.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2005] A 3D crustal gravity modelling of the Romanian territory. Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society, 8(4).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Korhonen, J.V., Fairhead, J.D., Hamoudi, M., Hemant, K., Lesur, V., Mandea, M., Maus, S., Purucker, M., Ravat, D., Sazonova, T. and Thebault, E.
    [2007] Magnetic anomaly map of the world, Scale 1: 50 000 000.Geological Survey of Finland, Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pharaoh, T.
    [1996] Trans-European Suture Zone. Phanerozoic accretion and the evolution of contrasting continental lithospheres. Gee, D.G. and Zeyen, H.J. (Eds) Lithosphere Dynamics: Origin and Evolution of Continents. EUROPROBE, Uppsala, 158.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Purucker, M.
    [1997] Magnetization of the earth’s crust.http://core2.gsfc.nasa.gov/research/crustal
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sandulescu, M. and Visarion, M.
    [1988] La structure des plate-formes situees dans l’avant-pays et au-dessous des nappes du flysch des Carpathes Orientales. Geofizica, D(15), Bucuresti.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414181
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414181
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error