1887

Abstract

Summary

We describe a simple and fast filtering procedure which is locally applied in spectral domain and uses iterative trimmed and truncated mean filter method (LITTM), to cancel harmonic noise with 50 or 60Hz and its multiples caused by power line during the seismic data acquisition in land and marine. The procedure doesn’t require any reference signal or an estimate accurately the fundamental frequency of the harmonic noise, but only it should be determined the approximate frequencies of the noise on the amplitude spectra. Real land and marine data examples show that the harmonic noise is filtered well without damaging the available frequencies around the fundamental frequency and provide clean outputs for later processes. We expect this procedure may be a useful tool to recover the signal masked by power line noise in other geophysical data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414220
2015-10-05
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aysal, T. and Barner, K.
    [2007] Generalized mean-median filtering for robust frequency-selective applications. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 55(3), 937–948.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berdnar, J.B.
    [1983] Applications of median filtering to deconvolution, pulse estimation and statistical editing of seismic data. Geophysics, 48, 1598–1610.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, K.E. and Russell, R.D.
    [2003] Cancellation of multiple harmonic noise series in geophysical records. Geophysics, 68, 1083–1090.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Duncan, G. and Beresford, G.
    [1995] Some analyses of 2-D median f–k filters. Geophysics, 60, 1157–1168.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiang, X.D.
    [2012] Iterative truncated arithmetic mean fitler and its properties. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 21, 537–1547.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Larsen, J.J., Dalgaard, E. and Auken, E.
    [2013] Noise cancelling of MRS signals combining model-based removal of powerline harmonics and multichannel Wiener filtering. Geophys. J. Int., 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Linville, F. and Meek, R.A.
    [1992] Cancelling stationary sinusoidal noise. Geophysics, 57, 1493–1501.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, C., Liu, Y., Yang, B., Wang, D. and Sun, J.
    [2006] A 2D multistage median filter to reduce random noise. Geophysics, 71, V105–V110.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Miao, Z. and JiangX.
    [2014] Additive and exclusive noise suppression by iterative trimmed and truncated mean algorithm. Signal Processing, 99, 147–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nyman, D.C. and Gaiser, J.E.
    [1983] Adaptive rejection of high-line contamination. 53rd Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 1270–1274.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Saucier, A., Marchant, M. and Chouteau, M.
    [2006] A fast and accurate frequency estimation method for canceling harmonic noise in geophysical records. Geophysics, 71, V7–V18.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Xia, J. and Miller, R.D.
    [2000] Design of a hum filter for suppressing power-line noise in seismic data. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 5, 31–38.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414220
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414220
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error