1887

Abstract

Summary

Geological CO2 storage bears potential impacts on groundwater. Potable groundwater resources are legally protected, therefore any potential negative impact caused by CO2 storage has to be considered. Injection of CO2 in a deep saline aquifer will alter the physical and chemical conditions in the reservoir. As a consequence, the in situ fluid is compressed, displaced, and migrates away from the injection site. Furthermore, numerous complexly coupled geochemical reactions occur, e.g. dissolution of alumosilicates. The assessment of site-specific and time-dependent coupled physico-chemical processes is vital to evaluate storage security.

Shallow freshwater aquifers can only be affected by the storage of CO2 in deep saline formations if leakage pathways like faults or abandoned wells facilitate the ascent of CO2 or saline formation water. Leakage cannot be excluded, but potential impacts on the environment should be minimized by site-specific monitoring. Groundwater monitoring involves detecting deviations from baseline or expected conditions and investigating causes of anomalies and verification of leakage. A large number of methods and tools are available from classical quantitative and qualitative groundwater monitoring. In practice, groundwater monitoring faces several challenges however. The primary requirements for safe CO2 storage and groundwater protection are thorough site characterization, conservative risk assessments, and unconditional site selection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414248
2015-10-13
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Birkholzer, J. T., Oldenburg, C. and Zhou, Q.
    [2015] CO2 migration and pressure evolution in deep saline aquifers. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. KatzungG., Krull, P. and Kuhn, F.
    [1996] Die Havarie der UGS-Sonde Lauchstadt 5 im Jahre 1988 -Auswirkungen und geologische Bedingungen, Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Geologie, 42, 19–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lions, J., Devau, N., de Lary, L, Dupraz, S, Parmentier, M., Gombert, P. and Dictor, M.-C.
    [2014] Potential impacts of leakage from CO2 geological storage on geochemical processes controlling fresh groundwater quality: A review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 22, 165–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, F., Lu, P., Griffith, C., Hedges, S.W., Soong, Y., Hellevang, H. and Zhu, C.
    [2012] CO2-brine-caprock interaction: Reactivity experiments on Eau Claire shale and a review of relevant literature. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 7, 153–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Meyer, R., May, F., Krull, P., Gaus, I., Durst, P., van der Meer, B. and Geel, K.
    [2005] Schweinrich-potential onshore carbon dioxide storage in Germany. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Geowissenschaften, 39, 269.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PalandriJ. L. and KharakaY. K.
    [2004] A compilation of rate parameters of water-mineral interaction kinetics for application to geochemical modeling. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations, Open File Report 2004–1068.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414248
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414248
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error