Multi‐geophysical approach for the better understanding and characterization of subsurface structures

References

1. BaliaR., GavaudoE., ArdauF. and GhiglieriG.2003. Geophysical approach to the environmental study of a coastal plain. Geophysics68, 1446–1459.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BaumanP.2005. 2‐D resistivity surveying for hydrocarbons – a primer. CSEG Recorder30, 25–33.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BeauvaisA., RitzM., ParisotJ.C., BantsimbaC. and DukhanM.2004. Combined ERT and GPR methods for investigating two‐stepped lateritic weathering systems. Geoderma119, 121–132.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BoernerD.E. and HolladayJ.S.1990. Approximate Frechet derivatives in inductive electromagnetic soundings. Geophysics55, 1589–1595.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CardarelliE., CercatoM., CerretoA. and Di FilippoG.2010. Electrical resistivity and seismic refraction tomography to detect buried cavities. Geophysical Prospecting58, 685–695.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ChambersJ.C., KurasO., MeldrumP.I., OgilvyR.D. and HollandsJ.2006. Electrical resistivity tomography applied to geologic, hydrogeologic, and engineering investigations at a former waste‐disposal site. Geophysics71, 231–239.
   [Google Scholar]
7. CoppensF.1985. First arrival picking on common‐offset trace collections for automatic estimation of static corrections. Geophysical Prospecting33, 1212–1231.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DahlinT., BernstoneC. and LokeM.H.2002. A 3‐D resistivity investigation of a contaminated site at Lernacken, Sweden. Geophysics67, 1692–1700.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DeyA. and MorrisonH.F.1979. Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three‐dimensional structures. Geophysics44, 753–780.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GallardoL.A. and MejuM.A.2003. Characterization of heterogeneous near‐surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data. Geophysical Research Letters30, 1658.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GallardoL.A. and MejuM.A.2004. Joint two‐dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross–gradients constraints. Journal of Geophysical Research109, B03209.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GardnerL.W.1939. An areal plan of mapping subsurface structure by refraction shooting. Geophysics4, 247–259.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HaeniF.P.1986. Application of seismic refraction methods in groundwater modeling studies in New England. Geophysics51, 236–249. HamdanH.A. and VafidisA. 2013. Joint inversion of 2D resistivity and seismic travel time data to image saltwater intrusion over karstic areas. Environmental Earth Sciences 68, 1877–1885.
    [Google Scholar]
14. HestenesC.M.R. and StiefelE.1952. Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards49, 409–436.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HoleJ.A.1992. Nonlinear high–resolution three–dimensional seismic travel time tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research97, 6553–6562.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HoleJ.A. and ZeltB.C.1995. 3‐D finite‐difference reflection traveltimes. Geophysical Journal International121, 427–434.
    [Google Scholar]
17. JarvisK.D. and KnightR.J.2002. Aquifer heterogeneity from SH‐wave seismic impedance inversion. Geophysics67, 1548–1557.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LegaultJ.M., CarriereD. and PetrieL.2008. Synthetic model testing and distributed acquisition dc resistivity results over an unconformity uranium target from the Athabasca Basin, northern Saskatchewan. The Leading Edge27, 46–51.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LeucciG., GrecoF., De GiorgiL. and MauceriR.2007. Three‐dimensional image of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography survey in the castle of Occhiola (Sicily, Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science34, 233–242.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LuD.B., ZhouQ.Y., JunejoS.A. and XiaoA.L.2014. A systematic study of topography effect of ERT based on 3‐D modeling and inversion. Pure and Applied Geophysics172, 1531–1546.
    [Google Scholar]
21. MelaK. and LouieJ.N.2001. Correlation length and fractal dimension interpretation from seismic data using variograms and power spectra. Geophysics66, 1372–1378.
    [Google Scholar]
22. PageL.M.1968. Use of the electrical resistivity method for investigating geologic and hydrogeologic conditions in Santa Clara County, CA. Ground Water6, 31–40.
    [Google Scholar]
23. ParkS.K. and VanG.P.1991. Inversion of pole‐pole data for 3‐D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes. Geophysics56, 951–960.
    [Google Scholar]
24. PenzS., ChaurisH., DonnoD. and MehlC.2013. Resistivity modelling with topography. Geophysical Journal International194, 1486–1497.
    [Google Scholar]
25. PridmoreD.F., HohmannG.W., WardS.H. and SillW.R.1981. An investigation of finite‐element modeling for electrical and electromagnetic data in three dimensions. Geophysics46, 1009–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
26. RückerC., GuntherT. and SpitzerK.2006. Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – I. Modelling. Geophysical Journal International166, 495–505.
    [Google Scholar]
27. SpitzerK. and WurmstichB.1999. Speed and accuracy in 3D resistivity modeling. Three‐Dimensional Electromagnetics7, 161–176.
    [Google Scholar]
28. SumanovacF. and WeisserM.2001. Evaluation of resistivity and seismic methods for hydrogeological mapping in karst terrains. Journal of Applied Geophysics47, 13–28.
    [Google Scholar]
29. TarantolaA.1987. Inverse Problems Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation.Elsevier, Siam.
    [Google Scholar]
30. TarantolaA. and ValetteB.1982. Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion. Reviews of Geophysics20, 219–232.
    [Google Scholar]
31. VidaleJ.1988. Finite‐difference calculation of travel times. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America78, 2062–2076.
    [Google Scholar]
32. WhiteR.M.S., CollinsS., DenneR., HeeR. and BrownP.2001. A new survey design for 3D IP modelling at Copper Hill. Exploration Geophysics32, 152–155.
    [Google Scholar]
33. WilsonS.R., InghamM. and McConchieJ.A.2006. The applicability of earth resistivity methods for saline interface definition. Journal of Hydrology316, 301–312.
    [Google Scholar]
34. ZeltC.A. and BartonP.J.1998. Three‐dimensional seismic refraction tomography: A comparison of two methods applied to data from the Faeroe Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth103, 7187–7210.
    [Google Scholar]
35. ZhangJ., MackieR.L. and MaddenT.R.1995. 3‐D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients. Geophysics60, 1313–1325.
    [Google Scholar]
36. ZhouQ.Y., ShimadaJ. and SatoA.1999. Three‐dimensional soil resistivity inversion using patching method. Journal of the Japan Society of Engineering Geology39, 524–532.
    [Google Scholar]