1887

Abstract

Summary

The issues of development of a method for quantitative formation evaluation in horizontal and highly deviated wells have been unaddressed for a long time due to complexities of geophysical fields distribution in such conditions and absence of proven algorithms of well logs forward solution. The latest advances in numerical modeling of nuclear and electrical well logs implemented in Techlog software made it possible to improve the quality of well log interpretation. The article presents approaches to spatial interpretation of data from horizontal and highly deviated wells using a method of forward modeling of well log response and reconstruction of “true” values of geophysical parameters of the formations intersected by a well, and compares the obtained results with actual data and conventional approaches. The first positive results were achieved, which demonstrated the prospects for further development of the research trend and the necessity of its improvement in the domain of account for the anisotropy of acoustic rock properties, reconstruction of true values of p- and s-waves, and seismic facies modeling

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414348
2015-10-20
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amer, A., Chinellato, F., Collins, S. et al.
    [2013] Structural Steering – A Path to Productivity. Oilfield Review, 25(1) (Spring 2013), 14–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruce, S., Newberry, B. et al.
    [1991] Down and out in logging. Middle East Well Evaluation Review, 11, 1991, 33–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Griffiths, R., Morriss, C., Ito, K., Rasmus, J. and Maggs, D.
    [2012] Formation Evaluation in High Angle and Horizontal Wells – A New and Practical Workflow. SPWLA 53rd Annual Logging Symposium, 16–20 June 2012, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Passey, Q.R., Yin, H., Rendeiro, C.M. and Fitz, D.E.
    [2005] Overview of high-angle and horizontal well formation evaluation. SPWLA 46th Annual Logging Symposium, 26–29 June 2005, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Valdisturlo, A., Mele, M. et al.
    [2013] Improved Petrophysical Analysis in Horizontal Wells: From Log Modeling Through Formation Evaluation to Reducing Model Uncertainty – A Case Study. EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE Europec, London, United Kingdom, 10–13 June 2013, 1–13. SPE-164881-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Maggs, D., Lattuada, S., Griffiths, R., Mele, M. and Valdisturlo, A.
    [2014] Petrophysics in High Angle and Horizontal Wells. Technology Explained. GeO ExPro, 11(1), 60–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun, K., Morriss, C., Rasmus, J., Ito, K., Asif, S., Griffiths, R., Maggs, D., Omeragic, D., Crary, S. and Abubakar, A.
    [2014] Automated resistivity inversion for efficient formation evaluation in high-angle and horizontal wells. SPWLA 55th Annual Logging Symposium, 18–22 May 2014, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414348
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201414348
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error