1887

Abstract

Summary

The recent gas discoveries in Central Luconia have been found in highly overpressured carbonate pinnacles. These structures have steep flanks and are buried by a layer of overpressured shales, where both vertical and lateral velocity variations exist due to the anisotropic effects and overpressures of the shales. Single time-depth functions usually underestimate the possible GRV of these structures. The result from using an integrated 3D seismic velocity approach is heavily dependent on having 3D seismic coverage and good seismic velocities.

An alternative depth-conversion approach is being proposed, whereby a hybrid VoK approach is being used to address the slower velocities in the overpressured shales. The anisotropy effects of the shales where studied using empirical data and its conclusion verified via a quick forward modeling exercise. In addition, the overall shape of the structure and internal facies of the carbonate pinnacle are used as QC constraints in verifying the results of the depth conversion exercise.

This alternative approach is highly-favored as it not only addresses the velocity variations from the overpressured shales, but also conforms to the subsurface geological model. The resulting depth structure of the carbonate pinnacle is both geologically and volumetrically consistent.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201523979
2015-10-12
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Chalabi, M.
    [1997b] Time-Depth Relationships for Multilayer Depth Conversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 45, 715–720.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartel, D.C., Busby, M., Nealon, J., and Zaske, J.
    [2006] Time to Depth Conversion and Uncertainty Assessment using Average Velocity Modeling. 67th International Exposition and Annual Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstract, 2166–2169.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Che-Shaari., BA, and Nur-Fadzlinda, B.M.K.
    [2014] The Awakened Giants. 7th International Petroleum Technology Conference, IPTC-17221.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Marsden, A., Bush, M.D. and Du, S.J.
    [1995] Analytic Velocity Functions. The Leading Edge, 14(7), 776–782.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Saiful, A. and Hairul, H.
    [2014] Carbonate Pinnacle-Reef Velocity Modeling for Depth Conversion: Pitfalls and Best Practices. 2014 Offshore Technology Conference, OTC-25068-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thomsen, L.
    [1986] Weak Elastic Anisotropy. Geophysics, 51(10), 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, Z. [2002] Seismic Anisotropy in Sedimentary Rocks, part 2: Laboratory Data. Geophysics, 67(5), 1423–1440.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wenk, H-R. et. al.
    [2008] Preferred Orientations and Anisotropy in Shales: Callovo-Oxfordian Shale (France) and Opalinus Clay (Switzerland). Clays and Clay Minerals, 56(3), 285–306.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201523979
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201523979
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error