1887

Abstract

Summary

We present a case study offshore Malaysia, shallow gas features in the overburden distort the seismic imaging at the target level. While a multifaceted approach involving a combination of seismic acquisition and processing strategies were used to improve the bandwidth of the seismic data, particularly for the lowfrequency content of the seismic image, several distortions still existed at the target level. The prominent structural sag evident at the reservoir level is a typical indication that the overlying shallow gas velocity model needed to be resolved and incorporated into a depth migration algorithm.

To resolve the transversally and laterally variant velocity features in the shallow gas areas, a solution that consisted of full waveform inversion (FWI) and high-resolution reflection traveltime tomography was utilized to produce an accurate compressional velocity model. To further resolve the amplitude and phase distortions at the reservoir level due to shallow gas effects, Q tomography was incorporated into the model building phase to derive a space-variant 1/Q model and Q compensation was integrated within depth migration.

The integrated approach of broadband receiver acquisition, data processing strategies and high-end Earth model building has cumulatively improved the imaging of the reservoir below the shallow gas anomalies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201526197
2015-10-12
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bishop, T.N., Bube, K.P., Cutler, R.T., Langan, R.T., Love, P.L., Resnick, J.R., Shuey, R.T., Spindler, D.A., and Wyld, H.W.
    [1985] Tomographic determination of velocity and depth in laterally varying media. Geophysics, 50, 903–923.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cavalca, M. I., Moore, L. Zhang, S.L. Ng, R.P. Fletcher and Bayly, M.
    [2011] Ray-based tomography for Q estimation and Q compensation in complex media. 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, E044.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu, W., Liu, J., Bear, L. and Marcinkovich, C.
    [2011] A robust and accurate seismic attenuation tomography algorithm. 82nd SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 30, 2727–2731.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaufman, H.
    [1953] Velocity functions in seismic prospecting. Geophysics, 18(2), 289–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ozdemir, A.K., Caprioli, P., Ozbek, A., Kragh, E., and Robertsson, J.O.A.
    [2008] Optimized deghosting of over/under towed-streamer data in the presence of noise. The Leading Edge, 27(2), 190–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tanis, M.C., Shah, H., Watson, P.A., Harrison, M., Yang, S., Lu, L., and Carvill, C.
    [2006] Diving-wave refraction tomography and reflection tomography for velocity model building. 77th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3340–3344.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tarantola, A.
    [1984] Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201526197
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201526197
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error