Geophysical Monitoring of CO2 Flow During Sandstone Flooding Experiments

References

1. Alemu, B.L., Aker, E., Soldal, M., Johnsen, Ø. and Aagaard, P.
   [2013] Effect of sub-core scale heterogeneities on acoustic and electrical properties of a reservoir rock: a CO2 flooding experiment of brine saturated sandstone in a computed tomography scanner. Geophysical Prospecting, 61(1), 235–250.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alnes, H., Eiken, O., Nooner, S., Sasagawa, G., Steinvold, T. and Zumberg, M.
   [2011] Results from Sleipner gravity monitoring: Updated density and temperature distribution of the CO2 plume. Energy Procedia, 4, 5504–5511.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Archie, G.E.
   [1942] The Electrical Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some Reservoir Characteristics.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arts, R., Chadwick, A., Eiken, O., Thibeau, S. and Nooner, S.
   [2008] Ten years’ experience of monitoring CO2 injection in the Utsira Sand at Sleipner offshore Norway. First Break, 26, 65–72.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brie, A., Pampuri, F., Marasala, A.F. & Meazza, O.
   1995. Shear sonic interpretation in gasbearing sands. Society of Petroleum Engineers SPE No. 30595.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chadwick, R.A., Arts, R. and Eiken, O.
   [2005] 4D seismic quantification of a growing CO2 plume at Sleipner, North Sea, In: Doré, A.G. and Vining, B. (Eds), Petroleum Geology: North-West Europe and Global Perspectives – Proceedings of the 6th Petroleum Geology Conference, 1385–1399.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Park, J., Vanneste, M., Bohloli, B., Viken, I., Bjørnarå, T.I.
   [2014] In situ resistivity of CO2 plume at Sleipner from CSEM and gravity data. Fourth EAGE CO2 Geological Storage Workshop, 22–24 April 2014, Stavanger, Norway.
   [Google Scholar]