1887
Volume 14 Number 1
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Production from underground coal mining in India has been decreasing since the last three decades. Blasting‐off‐the‐solid, in Indian underground mines, has been a widely practised method for winning coal while developing mine galleries in bord and pillar system. The blast holes are drilled in solid coal without free face in blasting‐off‐the‐solid method of mining and are blasted with permitted types of explosives and delay detonators. Blasting‐off‐the‐solid will play an important role in underground coal production. The mines that were planned earlier to be away from residential areas are now approaching to those areas. The coal reserves are being exploited very fast, and mine owners cannot ignore to take the coal beneath the structures/houses. In this paper, resistivity imaging technique has been used to document the change of subsurface structures/features between the surface and underground face, where blasting is carried out to extract the coal in underground coal mines. Resistivity imaging survey conducted at three mining sites revealed that there was no significant change in subsurface strata conducted during pre‐ and post‐blasting conditions. The slight change in resistivity values up to 35 Ωm up to a few metres of peripheral area of the blasting face in the mine may be either due to the effect of blast vibration and/or same void created by blasting or increase in porosity of overlying subsurface strata.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015051
2015-09-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DanielsF. and AlbertyR.A.1966. Physical Chemistry. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. GriffithsD.H., TurnbullJ. and OlayinkaA.I.1990. Two dimensional resistivity mapping with computer controlled array. First Break8, 121–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KellerG.V. and FrischknechtF.C.1966. Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting. Oxford: Pergamon Press Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LokeM.H.1994. The inversion of two dimensional resistivity data. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LokeM.H.1999. Time‐lapse resistivity imaging inversion. Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society European Section, Environmental Measurements Laboratory.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LokeM.H.2000. Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies. A practical guide for 2D and 3D surveys. Copyright of M. H. Loke.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PazdirekO. and BlahaV.1996. Examples of resistivity imaging using ME‐100 resistivity field acquisition system. EAGE 58th Conference and Technical Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SinghP.K. and RoyM.P.2008. Damage to surface structures due to underground coal mine blasting: apprehension or real cause?International Journal of Environmental Geology53(6), 1201–1211.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SinghP.K., RoyM.P. and SinghR.K.2005. Responses of roof and pillars of underground coal mines to vibration induced by adjacent open‐pit blasting. International Journal of Environmental Geology47(2), 205–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SinghP.K., SinghR.B. and SinghT.N.1999. A study on surface damage characterization due to underground blasting. In: 9th International Society for Rock Mechanics Congress, Paris (G.Vouille and P.Berest), pp. 1203–1207.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015051
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015051
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error