1887
Volume 64, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Most positive/negative curvature and flexure are among the most useful seismic attributes for detecting faults and fractures in the subsurface based on the geometry of seismic reflections. When applied to fracture characterization and modelling of a fractured reservoir, their magnitude and azimuth help quantify both the intensity and orientation of fracturing, respectively. However, previous efforts focus on estimating only the magnitude of both attributes, whereas their associated azimuth is ignored in three‐dimensional (3D) seismic interpretation. This study presents an efficient algorithm for simultaneously evaluating both the magnitude and azimuth of most positive/negative curvature and flexure from 3D seismic data. The approach implemented in this study is analytically more accurate and computationally more efficient compared with the existing approach. The added value of extracting most positive/negative curvature and flexure is demonstrated through the application to a fractured reservoir at Teapot Dome (Wyoming). First, the newly extracted attributes make computer‐aided fault/fracture decomposition possible. This allows interpreters to focus on one particular component for fracture characterization at a time, so that a composite fractured reservoir could be partitioned into different components for detailed analysis. Second, curvature/flexure azimuth allows interpreters to plot fracture histogram and/or rose diagram in an automatic and quantitative manner. Compared with the conventional plotting rose diagram based on manual measurements, automatic plotting is more efficient and offers unbiased insights into fracture systems by illuminating the most likely orientations of natural fractures in fractured reservoirs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12350
2015-12-02
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al‐DossaryS. and MarfurtK.J.2006. 3D volumetric multispectral estimates of reflector curvature and rotation. Geophysics71, 41–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BahorichM.S. and FarmerS.L.1995. 3D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features: The coherence cube. The Leading Edge16, 1053–1058.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BlumentrittC.H., MarfurtK.J. and SullivanE.C.2006. Volume‐based curvature computations illuminate fracture orientations—Early to mid‐Paleozoic, Central Basin Platform, west Texas. Geophysics71, B159–B166.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChopraS. and MarfurtK.J.2007a. Curvature attribute applications to 3D surface seismic data. The Leading Edge26, 404–414.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChopraS. and MarfurtK.J.2007b. Volumetric curvature attributes add value to 3D seismic data interpretation. The Leading Edge26, 856–867.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChopraS. and MarfurtK.J.2010. Integration of coherence and volumetric curvature images. The Leading Edge29, 1092–1107.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CooperS.P., HartB., LorenzJ.C., GoodwinL.B. and MillikenM.2002. Outcrop and Seismic Analysis of Natural Fractures, Faults and Structure at Teapot Dome, Wyoming: Wyoming Geologic Association Guidebook (Fifty Third Field Conference), pp. 63–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CooperS.P., GoodwinL.B. and LorenzJ.C.2006. Fracture and fault patterns associated with basement‐cored anticlines: the example of Teapot Dome, Wyoming. AAPG Bulletin90, 903–1920.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DiH. and GaoD.2014a. Gray‐level transformation and Canny edge detection for improved seismic discontinuity detection. Computer & Geosciences192–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DiH. and GaoD.2014b. A new analytical method for azimuthal curvature analysis from 3D seismic data. SEG meeting, Denver, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1634–1638.
  11. DiH. and GaoD.2014c. Predicting fracture orientations with volumetric curvature gradient analysis. In: AAPG Annual Conference and Exhibition Search and Discovery Article No. 41331.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DiH. and GaoD.2014d. A new algorithm for evaluating 3D curvature and curvature gradient from improved fracture detection. Computer & Geosciences70, 15–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GaoD.2013. Integrating 3D seismic curvature and curvature gradient attributes for fracture detection: Methodologies and Interpretational implications. Geophysics78, O21–O38.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GaoD. and DiH.2015. Extreme curvature and extreme flexure analysis for fracture characterization from 3D seismic data: New analytical algorithms and geologic implications. Geophysics80, IM11–IM20.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GilbertsonN.2006. 3D geologic modeling and fracture interpretation of the Tensleep Sandstone, Alcova Anticline, Wyoming. Master thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HenningsP.H., OlsenJ.E. and ThompsonL.B.2000. Combining outcrop data and three‐dimensional structural models to characterize fracture reservoirs: An example from Wyoming. AAPG Bulletin84, 830–849.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LimG.T. and ReddyJ.N.2003. On canonical bending relationships for plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures40, 3039–3067.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LisleR.J.1994. Detection of zones of abnormal strains in structures using Gaussian curvature analysis. AAPG Bulletin78, 1811–1819.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MarfurtK.J., KirlinR.L., FarmerS.H. and BahorichM.S.1998. 3D seismic attributes using a running window semblance‐based algorithm. Geophysics63, 1150–1165.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. NelsonR.A.2001. Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, Second Edition, pp. 332. Butterworth‐Heinemann, Gulf Professional Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. RobertsA.2001. Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons. First Break19, 85–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SchwartzB.C.2006. Fracture pattern characterization of the Tensleep Formation, Teapot Dome, Wyoming. MS thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SigismondiM.E. and SoldoJ.C.2003. Curvature attributes and seismic interpretation: Case studies from Argentina basins. The Leading Edge22, 1122–1126.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SmithV.L.2008. Modeling natural fracture network: establishing the groundwork for flow simulation at Teapot Dome, Wyoming. MS thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. TingdahlK.M. and de RooijM.2005. Semi‐automatic detection of faults in 3D seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting53, 533–542.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. YoungM.1978. statistical characterization of attribute matrices by computer. In: The 5th Progress Report of Contract DA‐ERO‐591‐73‐G0040, Report 5, pp. 1–16. U.S. Army European Research Office, London Report.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ZhengZ., KavousiP. and DiH.2014. Multi‐attribute and neural network‐based fault detection in 3D seismic interpretation. In: Advanced Materials ResearchVol. 838, pp. 1497–1502.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12350
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12350
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error