1887
Volume 64, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Marine magnetotelluric measurements using “free‐fall’’ instruments without effective compasses suffer from the problem of unknown orientation of the receivers at the seafloor. While past works indicate that marine magnetotelluric orientation of the instruments can be estimated by reference to land deployments of known orientation using the transfer tensor method, there is limited published information on how this is implemented in practice. We document this method and propose a set of new time‐ and frequency‐domain approaches to solve this orientation problem of the seafloor receivers. We test these methodologies in onshore and offshore magnetotelluric data whose orientations are well known and apply these techniques to marine magnetotelluric data with unknown orientation. For the controlled tests, both time‐ and frequency‐domain approaches produce overall comparable results. To investigate the effects of the subsurface structure distribution on the orientation process, a dimensionality analysis of a controlled dataset is carried out. In subsequent analysis using the available disoriented marine magnetotelluric data from offshore Brazil and from the Vassouras magnetic observatory on the mainland for remote referencing, frequency‐domain methods yield approximate orientation angles among themselves with low standard deviation each. Time‐domain results are consistent for most cases but differ from frequency‐domain results for some situations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12339
2016-01-14
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BahrK.1988. Interpretation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: regional induction and local telluric distortion. Journal of Geophysical Research62, 119–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BerdichevskyM. and DmitrievV.I.2008. Models and Methods of Magnetotellurics. Springer, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BibbyH.M., CaldwellT.G. and BrownC.2005. Determinable and non‐determinable parameters of galvanic distortion in magnetotellurics. Geophysical Journal International163(3), 915–930.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CaldwellT.G., BibbyH.M. and BrownC.2004. The magnetotelluric phase tensor. Geophysical Journal International158, 457–469.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChaveA.D. and JonesA.G.2012. The Magnetotelluric Method: Theory and Practice. University Press, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ConstableS.C., KeyK. and LewisL.2009. Mapping offshore sedimentary structure using electromagnetic methods and terrain effects in marine magnetotelluric data. Geophysical Journal International176, 431–442.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ConstableS.C., OrangeA.S., HoverstenG.M. and MorrisonH.F.1998. Marine magnetotellurics for petroleum exploration, part I: A sea‐floor equipment system. Geophysics63, 816–825.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. EgbertG.D.1997. Robust multiple‐station magnetotelluric data processing. Geophysical Journal International130, 475–496.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. FigueiredoI., MejuM.A. and FontesS.L.2008. Heterogeneous crust and upper mantle in the SE Brazilian Highlands and the relationship to surface deformation as inferred from magnetotelluric imaging. Journal of Geophysical Research113, B03404.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FontesS.L., de LugãoP.P., MejuM.A., PintoV.R., FlexorJ.M., UlugergerliE.U.et al. 2009. Marine magnetotelluric mapping of basement and salt bodies in the Santos Basin of Brazil. First Break27(5), 84–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GallardoL.A., FontesS.L., MejuM.A., BuonoraM.P. and de LugaoP.P.2012. Robust geophysical integration through structure‐coupled joint inversion and multispectral fusion of seismic reflection, magnetotelluric, magnetic and gravity images: Example from Santos Basin, offshore Brazil. Geophysics77(5), B237–B251.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GambleT.C., GoubauW.M. and ClarkeJ.1979. Error analysis for remote reference magnetotellurics. Geophysics44, 959–968.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GoubauW.M., MaxtonP.M., KochR.H. and ClarkeJ.1984. Noise correlation lengths in remote reference magnetotellurics. Geophysics49, 433–438.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HoverstenG.M., MorrisonH.F. and ConstableS.1998. Marine magnetotellurics for petroleum exploration part 2: Numerical analysis of subsalt resolution: Geophysics63, 826–840.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KeyK.2003. Application of broadband marine magnetotelluric exploration to a 3D salt structure and a fast spreading ridge. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LarsenJ.C., MackieR.L., ManzellaA., FiordelisiA. and RievenS.1996. Robust smooth magnetotelluric transfer functions. Geophysical Journal International124, 801–819.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MartíA., QueraltP., JonesA.G. and LedoJ.2005. Improving Bahr's invariant parameters using the WAL approach. Geophysical Journal International163(1), 38–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MartíA., QueraltP. and LedoJ.2009. WALDIM: a code for the dimensionality analysis of magnetotelluric data using the rotational invariants of the magnetotelluric tensor. Computers & Geosciences35(12), 2295–2303.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MittetR., AakervikO.M., JensenH.R., EllingsrudS. and StovasA.2007. On the orientation and absolute phase of marine CSEM receivers. Geophysics72(4), F145–F155.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MütschardL., HokstadK. and UrsinB.2014. Estimation of seafloor electromagnetic receiver orientation. Geophysics79, E81–E89.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. RodgersJ.L. and NicewanderA.1988. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. American Statistical Association42, 59–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SandbergS.K., WuX. and RoperT.2008. Salt mapping in the Gulf of Mexico using marine magnetotellurics. First Break26(6), 91–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Shalivahan and B.B.Bhattacharya2002. How remote can the far remote reference site for magnetotelluric measurements be?Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107(B6).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SwiftC.M.1967. A magnetotelluric investigation of an electrical conductivity anomaly in the southwestern United States. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. WeaverJ.T., AgarwalA.K. and LilleyF.E.M.2000. Characterization of the magnetotelluric tensor in terms of its invariants. Geophysical Journal International141, 321–336.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. WordD.R., SmithH.W. and BostickF.X.1970. An Investigation of the Magnetotelluric Tensor Impedance Method, Technical Report 82. Electrical Engineering Research Laboratory, University of Texas, Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12339
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12339
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error