Railway Ballast Fouling Detection Using GPR Data: Introducing a Combined Time–Frequency and Discrete Wavelet Techniques

References

1. Al‐QadiI.L., GhodgaonkarD.K., VaradaV.K. and VaradanV.V.1991. Effect of moisture on asphaltic concrete at microwave frequencies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing29(5), 710717.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Al‐QadiI.L., XieW. and RobertsR.2008a. Time‐frequency approach for ground penetrating radar data analysis to assess railroad ballast condition. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation19(4), 219–237.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Al‐QadiI.L., XieW. and RobertsR.2008b. Scattering analysis of ground‐penetrating radar data to quantify railroad ballast contamination. NDT & E International41(6), 441–447.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Al‐QadiI.L., XieW. and RobertsR.2010a. Optimization of antenna configuration in multiple‐frequency ground penetrating radar system for railroad substructure assessment. NDT & E International43(1), 20–28.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Al‐QadiI.L., XieW., JonesD.L. and RobertsR.2010b. Development of a time‐frequency approach to quantify railroad ballast fouling condition using ultra‐wide band ground‐penetrating radar data. International Journal of Pavement Engineering,11(4), 269–279.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Al‐QadiI.L., XieW.RobertsR. and LengZ.2010c. Data analysis techniques for GPR used for assessing railroad ballast in high radio‐frequency environment. Journal of Transportation Engineering136(4), 392–399.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ASTM C136
   ASTM C136 . 1995. Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates.American Society for Testing and Materials.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BailiJ., LahouarS., HergliM., Al‐QadiI.L. and BesbesK.2009. GPR signal de‐noising by discrete wavelet transform. NDT & E International42(8), 696–703.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BanoM.2004. Modelling of GPR waves for lossy media obeying a complex power law of frequency for dielectric permittivity. Geophysical Prospecting52(1), 11–26.
   [Google Scholar]
10. BenedettoA.2010. Water content evaluation in unsaturated soil using GPR signal analysis in the frequency domain. Journal of Applied Geophysics71(1), 26–35.
    [Google Scholar]
11. BroughM., StirlingA., GhataoraG. and MadelinK.2003. Evaluation of railway trackbed and formation: a case study. NDT & E International36(3), 145–156.
    [Google Scholar]
12. CarpenterD., JacksonPJ. and JayA.2004. Enhancement of the GPR method of railway trackbed investigation by the installation of radar detectable geosynthetics. NDT & E International37(2), 95103.
    [Google Scholar]
13. ChangC.W., LinC.H. and LienH.S.2009. Measurement radius of reinforcing steel bar in concrete using digital image GPR. Construction and Building Materials23(2), 1057–1063.
    [Google Scholar]
14. ChuangS.L.2012. Physics of Photonic Devices, Vol. 80.John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
15. ClarkM.R., GillespieR., KempT., McCannD.M. and FordeM.C.2001. Electromagnetic properties of railway ballast. NDT & E International34(5), 305–311.
    [Google Scholar]
16. CohenR.2012. Signal Denoising Using Wavelets, Project Report.Department of Electrical Engineering, Technion‐Israel Institute of Technology. [Online].
    [Google Scholar]
17. GallagherG.P., LeiperQ., WilliamsonR., ClarkM.R. and FordeM.C.1999. The application of time domain ground penetrating radar to evaluate railway track ballast. NDT & E International32(8), 463–468.
    [Google Scholar]
18. HayW.W.1982. Railroad Engineering. Vol. 1.John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
19. HlawatschF.
    and AugerF. (Eds.) 2008. Time‐frequency Analysis: Concepts and Methods.ISTE.
    [Google Scholar]
20. HuangH. and TutumluerE.2011. Discrete element modeling for fouled railroad ballast. Construction and Building Materials25(8), 33063312.
    [Google Scholar]
21. HuangH., TutumluerE. and DombrowW.2009. Laboratory characterization of fouled railroad ballast behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2117(1), 93–101.
    [Google Scholar]
22. HugenschmidtJ.2000. Railway track inspection using GPR. Journal of Applied Geophysics43(2), 147–155.
    [Google Scholar]
23. IndraratnaB., SuL. and RujikiatkamjornC.2011. A new parameter for classification and evaluation of railway ballast fouling. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(2), 322–326.
    [Google Scholar]
24. JackR. and JacksonP.1999. Imaging attributes of railway track formation and ballast using ground probing radar. NDT & E International32(8), 457–462.
    [Google Scholar]
25. JanardhanamR. and DesaiC.S.1983. Three‐dimensional testing and modeling of ballast. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering109(6), 783–796.
    [Google Scholar]
26. LeeD.T. and YamamotoA.1994. Wavelet analysis: theory and applications. Hewlett Packard Journal45, 44–44.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LengZ. and Al‐QadiI.L.2010. Railroad ballast evaluation using ground‐penetrating radar. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2159(1), 110–117.
    [Google Scholar]
28. MallatS.1999. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing.Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. MoreyR.M.1998. Ground Penetrating Radar for Evaluating Subsurface Conditions for Transportation Facilities.U.S. Transportation Research Board.
    [Google Scholar]
30. NarayananR.M., KumkeC.J. and LiD.1999. Railroad track monitoring using ground‐penetrating radar: simulation study and field measurements. In: SPIE International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation, pp. 243–251. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
    [Google Scholar]
31. PatriarcaC., TostiF., VeldsC., BenedettoA., LambotS. and SlobE.2013. Frequency dependent electric properties of homogeneous multiphase lossy media in the ground‐penetrating radar frequency range. Journal of Applied Geophysics97, 81–88.
    [Google Scholar]
32. RobertsR., Al‐QadiI.L., TutumluerE. and KathageA.2007. Ballast fouling assessment using 2 GHz horn antennas‐GPR and ground truth comparison from 238 km of track. In: 9th International Railway Engineering Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
33. SeligE.T. and WatersJ.M.1994. Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management. Thomas Telford.
    [Google Scholar]
34. SeligE.T.2002. Ground penetrating radar evaluation of railway track substructure conditions. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 4758, pp. 48–53.
    [Google Scholar]
35. ShangguanP., Al‐QadiI.L. and LengZ.2012. Development of wavelet technique to interpret ground‐penetrating radar data for quantifying railroad ballast conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2289(1), 95–102.
    [Google Scholar]
36. ShangguanP., Al‐QadiI., CoenenA. and ZhaoS.2014a. Algorithm development for the application of ground‐penetrating radar on asphalt pavement compaction monitoring. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, ahead‐of‐print, 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
37. ShangguanP. and Al‐QadiI.L.2014. Calibration of FDTD simulation of GPR signal for asphalt pavement compaction monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing53(3), 1538–1548.
    [Google Scholar]
38. SihvolaA.H.
    (Ed) 1999. Electromagnetic Mixing Formulas and Applications, No. 47. IET.
    [Google Scholar]
39. SussmannT.R., SeligE.T. and HyslipJ.P.2003. Railway track condition indicators from ground penetrating radar. NDT & E International36(3), 157–167.
    [Google Scholar]
40. TostiF., PatriarcaC., SlobE., BenedettoA. and LambotS.2013. Clay content evaluation in soils through GPR signal processing. Journal of Applied Geophysics97, 69–80.
    [Google Scholar]
41. ZhaoS. and Al‐QadiI.L.2016. Development of an analytic approach utilizing the extended common midpoint method to estimate asphalt pavement thickness with 3‐D ground‐penetrating radar. NDT & E International78, 29–36.
    [Google Scholar]
42. ZhaoS., ShangguanP. and Al‐QadiI.2015. Application of regularized deconvolution technique for predicting pavement thin layer thicknesses from ground penetrating radar data. NDT & E International73, 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]