1887

Abstract

Summary

We present a new multi-resolution (MR) approach to 3D electromagnetic (EM) modelling. Initially, the approach was developed for plain wave assumption. Current work is a further extension of the MR solver for controlled-source applications. Modelling with controlled-source requires the finer grid discretization in the near source location to accurately model the rapidly varying EM fields in the vicinity of the source. On the other hand, the EM field propagates in a diffusive manner and can be sufficiently well described on a grid that becomes gradually coarser with depth. We implement a MR finite-difference scheme that allows us to decrease the horizontal grid resolution with depth. MR approach, therefore, provides a means to significantly decrease the number of degrees of freedom and hence improve on computational efficiency without significantly compromising the accuracy of the solution. In MR implementation, the full grid is represented as a vertical stack of sub-grids, each of which is a standard staggered grid. Therefore, operators and functions already developed for a simpler standard structured grid can be applied for each sub-grid. The major difficulty lies in discretizing the operators around interfaces between varying cell sizes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600039
2016-03-18
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Yee, K. S.
    , 1966. Numerical Solution of Initial Boundary Value Problems Involving Maxwell’s equations in Isotropic Media, IEEE. Trans. Anten. Propag., 14(3), 302–307.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Newman, G. A. & Alumbaugh, D. L.
    , 1995. Frequency-domain modelling of airborne electromagnetic responses using staggered finite differences, Geophysical Prospecting, 43(8), 1021–1042.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Key, K.
    , 2009. 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers, GEOPHYSICS, 74(2), F9–F20.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Streich, R.
    , 2009. 3D fmite-difference frequency-domain modeling of controlled-source electromagnetic data: Direct solution and optimization for high accuracy, GEOPHYSICS, 74(5), F95–F105.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhdanov, M., Varentsov, I., Weaver, J., Golubev, N., & Krylov, V.
    , 1997. Methods for modelling electromagnetic fields results from COMMEMI the international project on the comparison of modelling methods for electromagnetic induction, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 37(3–4), 133–271, Methods for modelling electromagnetic fields.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600039
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600039
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error