1887

Abstract

Summary

The determination of fabric and pore structure of shales remains a challenging task which is mainly due to the wide range of pore sizes (and shapes) ranging from molecular dimensions to microns. High resolution imaging techniques fail to provide information over representative regions of interest, while more conventional characterization techniques may only assess volume averaged properties of the pore systems. Thus, open questions remain regarding the effects of the multi-scale pore network of shales in the retention and transport of hydrocarbons during unconventional production processes. We apply scanning small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS and WAXS) microscopy to obtain averaged but detailed information from the micro- and meso-pore structures of shales. By combining SAXS/WAXS with raster-scanning microscopy, we obtain local scattering information from 1–100 nm-size pores in micrometer-size volumes over a large (2 × 2) mm2 scanning area. We derive porosity, pore size distribution and orientation, as well as mineralogy of specially prepared thin section samples, covering length scale ranges of nm to sub-microns and from microns to millimeters, with a gap that can potentially be closed The method further enables the linking of porosity to shale matrix components, which is integrated in a multi-scale imaging workflow involving μCT, and SEM/EDX analysis, aimed at allowing for the full pore network characterization of shales.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600392
2016-05-02
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bunk, O. Bech, M. Jensen, T. H. Feidenhansl, R. Binderup, T. Menzel, A. Pfeiffer, F.
    [2009] Multimodal X-ray Scatter Imaging. New Journal of Physics, 11.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Clarkson, C.R. Solano, N. Bustin, A.M.M. Chalmers, G.R.L. He, L. Melnichenko, Y. B. Radlinski, A. P. Blach, T.P.
    [2013] Pore Structure Characterization of North American Shale Gas Reservoirs Using USANS/SANS, Gas Adsorption, and Mercury Intrusion. Fuel, 103, 606–6016.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fonseca, D.M. Meheust, Y. Fossum, J.O. Knudsen, K.D. Parmar, K.P.S.
    [2009] Phase Diagram of Polydisperse Na-Fluorohectorite-Water Suspensions: A Synchrotron Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Study. Physical Review E, 73.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Giannini, C., Siliqi, D., Ladisa, M., Altamura, D., Diaz, A., Beraudi, T., Sibillano, L., De Caro, S., Stea, F., Baruffaldi, F., Bunk, O.
    [2014] Scanning SAXS-WAXS Microscopy on Osteoarthritis-affected Bone – an Age-related Study. Journal of Applied Chrystallography, 47, 110–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Keller, L.M. Holzer, L. Schuetz, P. Gasser, P.
    [2013] Pore Space Relevant for Gas Permeability in Opalinus Clay: Statistical Analysis of Homogeneity, Percolation, and Representative Volume Element. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Keller, L.M. Schuetz, P. Erni, R. Rossell, M.D. Lucas, F. Gasser, P. Holzer, L.
    [2013] Characterization of Multi-Scale Microstructural Features in Opalinus Clay. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 170, 83–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. King, H.E. Eberle, A.P.R. Walters, C.C. KliewerC.E. ErtasD. Huynh, C.
    [2015] Pore Architecture and Connectivity in Gas Shale. Energy and Fuels, 29, 1375–1390.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Radlinski, A.P.
    [2006] Small-Angle Neutron Scattering and the Microstructure of Rocks. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 63, 363–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sing, K.S.W. Everett, D.H. Haul, R.A.W. Moscou, L. Pierotti, R.A. Rouquerol, J. Siemieniewska, T.
    [1985] Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 57, 603–619.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wenk, H.R. Voltolini, M. Mazurek, M. Van Loon, L.R. Vinsot, A.
    [2008] Preferred Orientations and Anisotropy in Shales: Callovo-Oxfordian Shale (France) and Opalinus Clay (Switzerland). Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 285–306.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600392
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600392
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error