3D inversion of irregular gridded 2D electrical resistivity tomography lines: Application to sinkhole mapping at the Island of Corfu (West Greece)

References

1. BernstoneC., DahlinT., OhlssonT. and HoglandH.2000. DC‐resistivity mapping of internal landfill structures: Two pre‐excavation surveys. Environmental Geology39, 360–371.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ChambersJ.E., KurasO., MeldrumP. and OgilvyR.2006. Electrical resistivity tomography applied to geologic, hydrogeologic, and engineering investigations at a former waste‐disposal site. Geophysics71, B231–B239.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ChambersJ.E., WilkinsonP.B., WellerA.L., OgilvyR.D., MeldrumP.I. and CauntS.2007. Mineshaft imaging using surface and crosshole 3D electrical resistivity tomography: A case history from the East Pennine Coalfield, UK. Journal of Applied Geophysics62, 324–337.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CooperA.H.1995. Subsidence hazards due to the dissolution of Permian gypsum in England: Investigation and remediation. In: Karst Geohazards: Engineering and Environmental Problems in Karst Terrane (ed F.B.Beck), pp. 23–29. Proceedings of the 5th Multidisciplinary Conference on Sinkholes and the Engineering and Environmental Impacts of Karst, Gatlinburg, TN, 2‐5 April 1995. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
   [Google Scholar]
5. DahlinT.2001. The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques. Computers & Geosciences27(9), 1019–1029.
   [Google Scholar]
6. DahlinT., BernstoneC. and LokeM.H.2002. Case history: A 3‐D resistivity investigation of a contaminated site at Lernacken, Sweden. Geophysics67, 1692–1700.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DahlinT. and LokeM.H.1997. Quasi‐3D resistivity imaging: Mapping of 3D structures using two dimensional DC resistivity techniques. Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society,Aarhus, Denmark, 8–11 September 1997, pp. 143–146.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DrahorM.G., KurtulmuT.O., BergeM.A., HartmannM. and SpeidelM.A.2008. Magnetic imaging and electrical resistivity tomography studies in a Roman military installation found in Satala archaeological site, northeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Archaeological Science35, 259–271.
   [Google Scholar]
9. EzerskyM.2008. Geoelectric structure of the Ein Gedi sinkhole occurrence site at the Dead Sea shore in Israel. Journal of Applied Geophysics64, 56–69.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GüntherT., RückerC. and SpitzerK.2006. Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of DC resistivity data incorporating topography— II. Inversion. Geophysical Journal International166, 506–517.
    [Google Scholar]
11. JohnsonK.2002. Karst in evaporite rocks of the United States. Carbonates and Evaporites17, 90–97.
    [Google Scholar]
12. KempeS.1972. Cave genesis in gypsum with particular reference to underwater conditions. Cave Science49, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
13. KimJ.‐H. and YiM.‐J.2010. DC2DPro‐2D interpretation of DC resistivity tomography. In: User’s Manual and Theory.Korea: Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Exploration.
    [Google Scholar]
14. LaBrecqueD.J., MilettoM., DailyW., RamirezA. and OwenE.1996. The effects of noise on Occam’s inversion of resistivity tomography data. Geophysics61, 538–548.
    [Google Scholar]
15. LokeM.H.2012. Tutorial: 2‐D and 3‐D electrical imaging surveys.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996. Practical techniques for 3‐D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophysical Prospecting44, 499–524.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MarescotL., LopesS.P., RigobertS. and GreenA.G.2008. Nonlinear inversion of geoelectric data acquired across 3‐D objects using a finite‐element approach. Geophysics73(3), F121–F133.
    [Google Scholar]
18. NegriS., LeucciG. and MazzoneF.2008. High resolution 3D ERT to help GPR data interpretation for researching archaeological items in a geologically complex subsurface. Journal of Applied Geophysics65(3–4), 111–120.
    [Google Scholar]
19. PapadopoulosN.G., TsourlosP., PapazachosC., TsokasG.N., SarrisA. and KimJ.H.2011. An algorithm for fast 3D inversion of surface electrical resistivity tomography data: Application on imaging buried antiquities. Geophysical Prospecting59, 557–575.
    [Google Scholar]
20. PapadopoulosN.G., TsourlosP., TsokasG.N. and SarrisA.2007. Efficient ERT measuring and inversion strategies for 3D imaging of buried antiquities. Near Surface Geophysics5, 349–361.
    [Google Scholar]
21. ParkS., KimC., SonJ.‐S., YiM.‐J. and KimJ.‐H.2009. Detection of cavities in a karst area by means of a 3D electrical resistivity technique. Exploration Geophysics40, 27–32.
    [Google Scholar]
22. ParkS.K. and VanG.P.1991. Inversion of pole‐pole data for 3‐D resistivity structures beneath arrays of electrodes. Geophysics56, 951960.
    [Google Scholar]
23. PaukstysB., CooperA.H. and ArustieneJ.1999. Planning for gypsum geohazards in Lithuania and England. Engineering Geology52(1–2), 93–103.
    [Google Scholar]
24. PidliseckyA., HaberE. and KnightR.2007. RESINVM3D: A MATLAB 3‐D resistivity inversion package. Geophysics72(2), H1–H10.
    [Google Scholar]
25. PoyiadjiE., NikolaouN. and KarmisP.2010. Ground failure due to gypsum dissolution. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece43(3), 1393–1405.
    [Google Scholar]
26. RückerC., GüntherT. and SpitzerK.2006. Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of DC resistivity data incorporating topography—I. Modelling. Geophysical Journal International166, 495–505.
    [Google Scholar]
27. RückerD.F., LevittM.T. and GreenwoodW.J.2009. Three‐dimensional electrical resistivity model of a nuclear waste disposal site. Journal of Applied Geophysics69, 150–164.
    [Google Scholar]
28. RückerD.F., LokeM.H., NoonanG.E. and LevittM.T.2010. Electrical resistivity characterization of an industrial site using long electrodes. Geophysics75(4), WA95–WA104.
    [Google Scholar]
29. RückerD.F. and NoonanG.E.2013. Using marine resistivity to map geotechnical properties: a case study in support of dredging the Panama Canal. Near Surface Geophysics11, 625–637.
    [Google Scholar]
30. SasakiY.1994. 3‐D resistivity inversion using the finite element method. Geophysics59, 1839–1848.
    [Google Scholar]
31. SoupiosP.M., GeorgakopoulosP., PapadopoulosN., SaltasV., AndreadakisA., VallianatosF.et al.2007. Use of engineering geophysics to investigate a site for a building foundation. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering4(1), 94–103.
    [Google Scholar]
32. SpitzerK. and ChouteauM.2003. A dc resistivity and IP borehole survey at the Casa Berardi gold mine in northwestern Quebec. Geophysics68, 453–463.
    [Google Scholar]
33. SpitzerK., ChouteauM. and BoulangerO.1999. Grid‐independent electrode positioning for 3D dc and IP forward modeling. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Three Dimensional Electromagnetics, pp. 189–192.
    [Google Scholar]
34. TsourlosP. and OgilvyR.1999. An algorithm for the 3‐D inversion of tomographic resistivity and induced polarization data: Preliminary results. Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society2, 30–45.
    [Google Scholar]
35. van SchoorM.2002. Detection of sinkholes using 2D electrical resistivity imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 393–399.
    [Google Scholar]
36. YiM.‐J., KimJ.‐H., SongY., ChoS.‐J., ChungS.‐H. and SuhJ.‐H.2001. Three‐dimensional imaging of subsurface structures using resistivity data. Geophysical Prospecting49, 483–497.
    [Google Scholar]
37. YiM.‐J., KimJ.‐H. and ChungS.2003. Enhancing the resolving power of least‐squares inversion with active constraint balancing. Geophysics68, 931–941.
    [Google Scholar]