A 2.5D Comparison between Two CSEM Methods

References

1. Alumbaugh, D. Cuevas, N.H., Chen, J., Gao, G., Brady, J.
   [2010] SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3893–3897.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chave, A., and Cox, C.
   [1982] Controlled electromagnetic sources for measuring electrical conductivity beneath the oceans 1: Forward problem and model study. Journal of Geophysical Research, 87, 5327–5338.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chave, A., Constable, S., and Edwards, R.
   [1991] Electrical exploration methods for the seafloor, in M. N.Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics. SEG, Investigations in Geophysics, 2(3), 931–966.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Connell, D., and K.Key
   [2013] A numerical comparison of time and frequency-domain marine EM methods for hydrocarbon exploration in shallow water. Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 187–199.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Constable, S.
   [2006] Marine electromagnetic methods — A new tool for offshore exploration. The Leading Edge, 25, 438–444.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Constable, S.
   [2010] Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics, 75, A67–A81.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eidesmo, T., Ellingsrud, S., MacGregor, L., Constable, S., Sinha, M., Johansen, S., Kong, F., and Westerdahl, H.
   [2002] Sea bed logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas. First Break, 20, 144–152.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Frafjord, Ø., Key, K., Helwig, S.L., El Kaffas, A.M., Holten, T. and Eide, K.
   [2015] Time Domain 2D CSEM Inversion with Induced Polarization. 77th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Madrid, N 105 02.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Holten, T., FlekkøyE. G., Singer, B., Blixt, E. M., Hanssen, A., and Jørgen, K.
   [2009] Vertical source, vertical receiver, electromagnetic technique for offshore hydrocarbon exploration. First Break, 27, 89–93.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Håland, E., Flekkøy, E., Måløy, J.
    [2012] Vertical and horizontal components of the electric background field at the sea bottom. Geophysics, 77, E1–E8.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jang, H., Jang, H., Lee, K.H., and Kim, H.J.
    [2013] Step-off, vertical electromagnetic responses of a deep resistivity layer buried in marine sediments. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10(2).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kaffas, A.M. El, Frafjord, Ø, Helwig, S.L. and Eide, K.
    [2013] Vertical Dipole Electromagnetic Survey to Reduce Hydrocarbon Exploration Risk, Kakelborg - A Case Study. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, London, We 04 08.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Key, K.
    [2009] 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers. Geophysics, 74, F9–F20.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Key, K. and Ovall, J.
    [2011] A parallel goal-oriented adaptive finite element method for 2.5-D electromagnetic modelling. Geophys. J. Int., 186 (1), 137–154.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Key, K.
    [2012a] Is the fast Hankel transform faster than quadrature?Geophysics, 77(3), F21–F30.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Key, K.
    [2012b] Marine EM inversion using unstructured grids: a 2D parallel adaptive finite element algorithm. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]