1887

Abstract

Summary

In time-lapse processing, independent regularization of each vintage is the typical approach. This disregards any geometrical limitations imposed by different surveys. Here we recast the regularization process as a minimization problem with model-space constraints. These constraints couple geometrical relations between surveys to improve repeatability. We also demonstrate how to solve the minimization problem using a practical and pragmatic approach. Results from a North Sea dataset show overall reduction of 4D noise, especially around less repeatable parts of the surveys including the undershoot zone.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600585
2016-05-30
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Calvert, R.
    [2005] 4D technology: where are we, and where are we going?Geophysical Prospecting, 53, 161–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Poole, G. and Lecerf, D
    [2006] Effect of regularization in the migration of time-lapse data. First Break, 24(4), 25–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Xu, S., ZhangY., Pham, D., and LambaréG.
    [2005] Antileakage Fourier transform for seismic data regularization. Geophysics, 70(4), V87–V95.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, R., Xuan, Y. and PengC.
    [2014] Cooperative attenuation of non-repeatable noise in time-lapse processing. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 4853–4857.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600585
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600585
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error