1887

Abstract

Summary

The present burial depth of the paleokarst reservoirs in the Tarim Basin is greater than 5000m, which premises rigorous demands for the data quality for accurate predictions. Although routinely used for reservoir prediction, the conventional full-stack data are often contaminated by the AV O (amplitude versus offset) effects no matter how much signal to noise ratio degree can be enhanced via stacking. This contamination usually changes with different geological deposits, and could reach an inappropriate and unacceptable level for the deeply buried carbonate reservoir in the Tarim Basin. In this paper, the pure P-wave data theoretically inverted through AVO effects removal are employed to improve the reservoir prediction, which are illustrated by the comparisons with that of the conventional full-stack data for the four classical AVO models and the field data in the ZG8 area, Tarim Basin. The dominant frequency has been improved for 8 Hz from 15 to 23 Hz in the target Yingshan formation, Ordovician through AVO effects removal, and the reflection events of the pure P-wave data are obviously more continuous comparing with that of the full-stack data. The fake potential reservoir caused by AVO effects in the northeast area has been removed, while the integral delineation of paleokarst reservoirs have been significantly improved with a higher fitness with the oil-testing results, which are more beneficial for later on exploration. The pure P-wave data inversion is in essence an important complement to current processing strategy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600646
2016-05-30
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Castagna, J.P., H.W.Swan, and D.J.Foster
    , [1998] Framework for AVO gradient and intercept interpretation. Geophysics, 63, 948–956.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gidlow, P.M., Smith, G.C. and Vail, P.J.
    [1992] Hydrocarbon detection using fluid factor traces: A case history. Expanded Abstracts of the Joint SEG/EAEG Summer Research Workshop on “How Useful is Amplitude-Versus-Offset (AVO) Analysis?”, 78–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Han, J., Sun, Z., Zhang, X., et al.
    [2013] Integrated identification for complex reservoir based on pure P-wave data and Post-stack data. 83rd SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1400–1404.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Rutherford, S.R. and R.H.Williams
    , [1989] Amplitude-versus-offset in gas sands. Geophysics, 54, 680–688.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang, P., Liu, Y., Hou, Y. et al.
    [2007] Carbonate-reservoirs prediction strategy and technologies in Tarim Basin of China. 77th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstract, 2738–2742.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, Y., Sun, Z. and Fan, C.
    [2013] An iterative AVO inversion workflow for S-wave improvement. 75th EAGE Expanded Abstract.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, Y., Sun. Z., Yang, H. et al.
    [2011] Pre-stack inversion for caved carbonate reservoir prediction: A case study from Tarim Basin, China. Petroleum Science, 8(4), 415–421.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, Y., Sun. Z., J. Han, J. et al.
    [2015] Fluid mapping in deeply buried Ordovician paleokarst reservoirs in the Tarim Basin, western China. Geofluids, DOI:10.1111/gfl.12160.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/gfl.12160 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600646
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600646
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error