1887

Abstract

Summary

Obtaining interlayer weak reflection information that helps identify properties and accurate density information from complex and elusive reservoirs is particularly important for reservoir characterization and detection. However, conventional AVO inversion method is strongly influenced by the accuracy of the approximate Zoeppritz equations, which suppresses weak reflections coming from the commonly used prior distribution. In this abstract, we address these problems by using exact Zoeppritz equations. First, the inverse problem was constructed and the modified Cauchy distribution was introduced as the prior information by utilizing Bayes’ theorem. We then combined the idea of generalized linear inversion with Iterative Reweighed Least-Squares (IRLS) Algorithm to solve the problem. From the Zoeppritz equations, the complicated objective function was used for inversing the P- and S-wave velocities and density. The idea of GLI is used to solve the objective function, from which a nonlinear solution of the model parameters’ perturbations can be calculated. The IRLS Algorithm was applied to solve the nonlinear expression to obtain an updated iterative formula of the model parameters. Both synthetic and field data examples show that the new method can not only directly inverse P- and S-wave velocity and density, but also provides accurate estimation results, particularly for density.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600714
2016-05-30
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K., Richards, P.G.
    [1980] Quantitative seismology: Theory and methods.W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kurt, H.
    [2007] Joint inversion of AVA data for elastic parameters by bootstrapping. Computers & Geosciences, 33(3), 367–382. DOI: 0.1016/j.cageo.2006.08.012.
    https://doi.org/0.1016/j.cageo.2006.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  3. Khare, V.
    [2007] Density Inversion using Joint PP/PS data: Sensitivity to the Angle Range. 77th Annual International Meeting SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 965–969.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Stewart, R.R.
    [1990]. Joint P and P-SV inversion. CREWES Research Report, 2, 112–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang, P. and Yin, X.
    [2008] Prestack seismic inversion method based on support vector machine. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 32(1), 37–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yuan, S., Wang, S. and Tian, N.
    [2009] Swarm intelligence optimization and its application in geophysical data inversion. Applied Geophysics, 6(2), 166–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, F., Liu, J., Yin, X. and Yang, P.
    [2008] Modified Cauchy-constrained seismic blind deconvolution. Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 43(4), 391–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, F., Wei, F., Wang, Y., Wang, W. and Li, Y.
    [2013] Generalized linear AVO inversion with the priori constraint of trivariate Cauchy distribution based on Zoeppritz equation. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 56(06), 2098–2115.DOI: 10.6038/cjg20130630.
    https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20130630 [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhi, L., Chen, S. and Li, X.
    [2013] Joint AVO inversion of PP and PS waves using exact Zoeppritz equation. 83rd Annual International Meeting SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 457–461.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600714
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600714
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error