1887

Abstract

Summary

We present a cut-&-paste strategy for the 3D inversion of helicopter-borne frequency-domain electromagnetic data. Standard interpretation procedures often involve laterally constrained stitched ID inversion techniques to create pseudo-3D models that are largely representative for smoothly varying conductivity distributions in the subsurface. Pronounced lateral conductivity changes may, however, produce significant artefacts that can lead to serious misinterpretation. Still, 3D inversions are numerically very expensive. Our approach therefore restricts the full 3D inversion to those parts of the survey where the ID inversion actually fails. Using a cut-&-paste technique, those regions are extracted, separately inverted in 3D, and finally re-introduced into the original model. We apply a Gauss-Newton inversion scheme using a staggered-grid finite-difference forward operator that takes into account the dielectric response. An explicit representation of the Jacobian matrix serves for optimum computational performance. We introduce a three-way tensor quantity which facilitates the matrix assembly of the forward operator as well as the efficient calculation of the Jacobian. Finally, we deliver the proof of concept for the inversion using a synthetic and a field data set from the Cuxhaven tunnel valley in Germany.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600939
2016-05-30
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Canny, J.
    [1986] A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8, 679–698.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox, L.H., Wilson, G.A. and Zhdanov, M.S.
    [2010] 3D Inversion of Airborne Electromagnetic Data Using a Moving Footprint. Exploration Geophysics, 41, 250–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hestenes, M.R. and Stiefel, E.
    [1952] Methods of Conjugate Gradients for Solving Linear Systems. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 49(6), 409–436.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Paige, C.C. and Saunders, M.A.
    [1982] LSQR: An Algorithm for Sparse Linear Equations and Sparse Least Squares. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 8(1), 43–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Scheunert, M.
    [2015] 3D inversion of Helicopter-borne Electromagnetic Data. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universitat Bergakademie Freiberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Siemon, B., Auken, E. and Christiansen, A.V.
    [2009] Laterally Constrained Inversion of Helicopter-Borne Frequency-Domain Electromagnetic Data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 67, 259–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ullmann, A., Siemon, B., Scheunert, M., Afanasjew, M., Borner, R.U., Spitzer, K. and Miensopust, M.
    [2013] Combined 1-D and 3-D Inversion of Helicopter-borne Electromagnetic Data. Near Surface Geoscience 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wait, J.R.
    [1953] Propagation of Radio Waves Over a Stratified Ground. Geophysics, 18, 416–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yee, K.S.
    [1966] Numerical Solution of Initial Boundary Value Problems Involving Maxwell’s Equations in Isotropic Media. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 14, 302–307.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600939
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600939
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error