1887

Abstract

Summary

The interpretation of co-located CSEM and velocity data benefits significantly from integrated analysis and joint calibration due to the fact that, although each method responds to a distinct physical property, they both respond to the same rock and fluid volumes; useful correlations are therefore expected to exist. The literature describes empirical relationships between velocity and resistivity background depth trends. It has generally been noted that the primary petrophysical link between the two physical properties is porosity. Although this connection can be described using porosity-based rock physics models, we recognize that real log data often do not conform to strict theoretical assumptions; therefore, we adopt a data-driven approach to resistivity prediction that implicitly accounts for the underlying relationships without incorporating bias toward a particular rock physics model. Using this methodology, we predict background (non-hydrocarbon bearing) horizontal resistivity sections from interval seismic velocities for calibration of CSEM inversions. The background horizontal resistivity predictions generally have strong agreement with the CSEM inversion background resistivity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600944
2016-05-30
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K. and Richards, P.
    [1979] Quantitative seismology. WH. Freeman and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archie, G.E.
    [1942] The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir character-istics. Transactions of the AIME, 54–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baltar, D. and N.D.Barker
    [2015] Prospectivity Evaluation with CSEM. First Break33(9), 33–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Faust, L.Y.
    [1953] A velocity function including lithologic variation. Geophysics, 18, 271–288.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hermance, J.F.
    [1979] The electrical conductivity of materials containing partial melt: A simple model from Archie’s law. Geophysical Research Letters, 6, 613–616.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600944
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600944
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error