1887

Abstract

Summary

As the development of the seismic exploration, the marine acquisition with towed streamers becomes an important procedure for seismic data acquisition. While because of the presence of the air-water reflective interface, the generated surface-related multiples, especially the ghosts, can affect the performance of the following seismic data processing. Therefore, we derive the deghosting algorithm using the Transmission matrix (T-matrix) method, including all scattering effects, which is convergent absolutely, instead of the inverse scattering series method which sometimes exists divergence. Then, layered synthetic data is used to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method and its robustness is also tested using the noisy synthetic data. Finally, the complicated data from the open SMAART Pluto model is used to further demonstrate the validity of the proposed method. Different examples demonstrate the validity of the proposed method. While the proposed method is currently used in the 2D constant depth streamer cases which requires the accurate depth information, and the extension into the variable depth streamer cases and the 3D cases is left for the future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601000
2016-05-30
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AmundsenL., and ZhouH,
    [2013] Low-frequency seismic deghosting, Geophysics, 78(2): WA15-WA20.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DayA., KlüverT., SöllnerW., TabtiH, and CarlsonD.,
    [2013] Wavefield-separation methods for dual-sensor towed-streamer data, Geophysics, 78(2): WA55-WA70.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. LuoJ., and WuR,
    [2015] Seismic envelop inversion: reduction of local minima and noise resistance, Geophysical Prospecting, 63(3): 597–614.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. WangB., WuR, and ChenX.,
    [2016] Non-linear parameter estimation method based on T-matrix, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, Accept for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. WegleinA. B., AraújoF. V., CarvalhoP. M., StoltR H, MatsonK. H, CoatesR T., CorriganD., FosterD. J., ShawS. A., and ZhangH,
    [2003] Inverse scattering series and seismic exploration, Inverse problems, 19(6): R27–R83.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WuR, LuoJ., and WuB.,
    [2014] Seismic envelope inversion and modulation signal model, Geophysics, 79(3): WA13–WA24.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. WuR, WangB., and HuC
    , [2015] Renormalized nonlinear sensitivity kernel and inverse thin-slab propagator inT-matrix formalism for wave-equation tomography, Inverse problems, 31(11): 115004.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601000
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601000
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error