1887

Abstract

Summary

Recent incidents of positive magnitude earthquakes associated with fluid injection in petroleum field operations have raised concerns among the general public and government regulators, prompting the proposal or adoption of legislation aimed at mitigating the occurrence of events with the potential to cause damage or injury. However, the thresholds used by such regulations are based on earthquake magnitude, which does not directly determine the hazard associated with an earthquake. Qualitative and quantitative data show that fluid-induced events produce less ground motion than naturally-occurring tectonic events of the same magnitude, due to lower stress drop values. Even accounting for the difference in typical event depth, tectonic events produce stronger ground motion than equivalent magnitude fluid-induced events. There is the potential for magnitude estimates to be biased by recording geometry and other factors, introducing a source of uncertainly, as well as possible discrepancies between estimates for the same event from different monitoring networks. For these and other reasons, it may be more appropriate to base regulations on the observed ground motion due to fluid-induced earthquakes, which is most indicative of the potential damage. Existing regulatory standards for the mining and construction industries may be adapted for this purpose.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601265
2016-05-30
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alberta Energy Regulator
    [2015] Subsurface Order No. 2
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baig, A., Urbancic, T. and Bosnian, K.
    [2014] Maximum Magnitudes for Frac-Related Seismicity: Observations from Different Formations Across North America. SEG 1st International Microseismic Technology Workshop, Asheville, NC, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. British Columbia Oil & Gas Commission
    [2014] Investigation of Observed Seismicity in the Montney Trend.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. British Standards Institution
    [1992] BS 6472: Evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings (1–80 Hz). BSI, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Department of Energy & Climate Change, United Kingdom
    [2013] Traffic light monitoring system infographic.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ground Water Protection Council and Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission
    [2015] Potential Injection-Induced Seismicity Associated with Oil & Gas Development: A Primer on Technical and Regulatory Considerations Informing Risk Management and Mitigation.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hough, Susan E.
    [2014] Shaking from injection-induced earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104, 2619–2626.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Illinois Department of Natural Resources
    [2013] Notice of Proposed Amendment: 62–240 Illinois Oil and Gas Act.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kwiatek, G, Plenkers, K., Dresen, G. and JAGUARS Research Group
    [2011] Source Parameters of Picoseismicity at Mponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa: Implications for Scaling Relations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(6), 2592–2608.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nicholson, Barclay R.
    [2015] Induced Seismicity Legal Issues Break New Ground. Law360.com, May15, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601265
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601265
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error