1887

Abstract

Summary

A new method for estimating apparent terrain densities and computing a variable terrain correction has arisen from consideration of the separation of an apparent density contrast effect due to the terrain interface, to the effect of geological density contrasts in the near subsurface on the observed gravitational signal. The method involves an equivalent source or half-space 3D density inversion to predict densities. Statistical correlation methods for estimating terrain density can provide average terrain correction densities but not whole-survey variable estimations. Stochastic full tensor inversion of a 3D density voxet with a mean equivalent to the average terrain correction density and a broad property distribution can produce a consistent variable density terrain correction (VTC) and an optimised apparent terrain density 3D voxet.

If the input to the inversion is the gravity response of the terrain, ie the average terrain correction itself, then the forward response tensor grid of the optimised 3D density voxet is itself a VTC. By vertically averaging the 3D density voxet we get a 2D apparent terrain density grid which reflects the terrain. This method is independent of near-surface geology effects and only due to terrain. Applications are potentially widespread and show great promise in exploration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601297
2016-05-30
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lane, R. and Guillen, A.
    [2006] Geologically-inspired Constraints for a Potential Field Lithoinversion Scheme. Proceedings of IAMG’05: GIS and Spatial Analysis, 1, 181–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakeley, R.J.
    [1995] Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. FitzGerald, D. J., Paterson, R., Christensen, A. N.
    [2011] Decorrelating Measured Airborne Gravity Gradiometry Data with Topography. Geosynthesis Conference Abstract, Capetown.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zengerer, M.
    [2014] Use of geostatistically-constrained potential field inversion and downhole drilling to predict distribution of sulfide and uranium mineralisation. Proceedings Ninth International Mining Geology Conference, 281–290 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Direen, N.G.
    [2001] Application of terrain corrections in Australia. Geoscience Australia: Projects: National Gravity Databases: terrain corrections.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, K., Kass, M. A., Li, Y.
    [2011]. Rapid gravity and gravity gradiometry terrain corrections via an adaptive quadtree mesh discretization. Exploration Geophysics, 42, 88–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nettleton, L.L.
    [1939] Determination of density for reduction of gravitimeter observations. Geophysics. 4, 8176–8183
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Parasnis, D.S.
    [1952] A study of rock densities in English Midlands. Geophys J Int.6:252–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Toushmalani, R. and Rahmati, A.
    [2014] A new inversion method of estimation of simultaneous near surface bulk density variations and terrain correction across the Bandar Charak (Hormozgan-Iran). http://www.springerplus.com/content/3/1/135.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Barnes, G.
    [2012] Reconstructing the gravity gradient anomaly field from surveys with wide line spacing using equivalent source processing: an error analysis. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(3), 646–657.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601297
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601297
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error