1887

Abstract

Summary

Analysing S-wave splitting has become a routine step in processing multicomponent data. Typically, this analysis leads to the determination of the principal directions of the anisotropic medium and to the time delays between the fast and slow S-waves. These parameters are estimated layer-by-layer from the top. Errors in layer stripping occurring in shallow layers might propagate to deeper layers.

We propose a different approach that consists of inverting interval values of splitting intensity to obtain a model of anisotropic parameters that vary with time or depth. Splitting intensity is a robust measurement with respect to structural variations and is commutative, which means that it can be summed along a ray (or throughout a sensitivity kernel volume) and can be linearly related to anisotropic perturbations at depth. Therefore, it is possible to estimate anisotropic properties within a geological formation (e.g., the reservoir) by analysing the differences of splitting intensity measured at the top and at the bottom of the layer. This allows us to avoid layer stripping, in particular, for shallow layers where anisotropic parameters are difficult to estimate due to poor coverage, and it makes S-wave splitting analysis simpler to apply. We demonstrate the method on synthetic and real data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601363
2016-05-30
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alford, R.M.
    [1986] Shear data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy. 56th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 5, 476.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bale, R., Gratacos, B., Mattocks, B., Roche, S., Poplavskii, K., and Li, X.
    [2009] Shear wave splitting applications for fracture analysis and improved imaging: Some onshore examples. First Break, 27, 73–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chevrot, S.
    [2000] Multichannel analysis of shear wave splitting. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 579–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chevrot, S., Favier, N., and Komatitsch, D.
    [2004] Shear wave splitting in three-dimensional anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International, 159, 711–720.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaiser, J.E.
    [1999] Applications for vector coordinate systems of 3-D converted wave data. The Leading Edge, 18, 1290–1300.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Haacke, R. R.
    [2013] High-precision estimation of split PS-wave time delays and polarization directions. Geophysics, 78 (2), V63–V77.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sieminski, A., Paulssen, H., Trampert, J., and Tromp, J.
    [2008] Finite-frequency SKS splitting: measurement and sensitivity kernels. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 98, 1797–1810.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Silver, P. G., and Chan, W. W.
    [1991] Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 429–454.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601363
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601363
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error