1887

Abstract

Summary

Reliable fluid identification results are very important for us to improve the success rate of oil exploration. At the present stage, recognition of reservoir fluid mainly rely on seismic amplitude anomalies and elastic parameters difference, in practical applications, there are often problems that seismic amplitude response is not obvious to hydrocarbon and the elastic parameters distinction between hydrocarbon and water is not strong. So, using conventional methods would lead to multiplicity of hydrocarbon detection. The oil-bearing reservoir leads to more strong velocity dispersion and energy attenuation of seismic wave than water-bearing reservoir, it is feasible to use velocity dispersion and energy attenuation to detect hydrocarbon reservoir. In this paper, we obtain hydrocarbon-sensitive factor by merging velocity dispersion property and energy attenuation property and using the information of hydrocarbon information of wells to control the merge answers, and proposed the velocity dispersion and energy attenuation attributes fusion hydrocarbon detection method. The practical data test of Bohai A oilfield proved that this method can effectively predict hydrocarbon reservoirs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601391
2016-05-30
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berryman, J.G. and Wang, H.F.
    [1995] The elastic coefficients of double-porosity models for fluid transport in jointed rock. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100 (B12), 24611–24627.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Batzle, M.R., Hofmann, D.H. and Castagna, J.
    [2001] Fluids and frequency dependent seismic velocity of rocks. The Leading Edge, 20, 168–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carcione, J.M. and Picotti, S.
    [2006] P-wave seismic attenuation by slow wave diffusion: Effects of inhomogeneous rock properties. Geophysics, 71(3), O1–O8.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapman, M.
    [2003] Frequency-dependent anisotropy due to meso-scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity. Geophysical Prospecting, 51, 369–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chapman, M., Zatsepin, S.V. and Crampin, S.
    [2002] Derivation of a microstructural poroelastic model. Geophysical Journal International, 151, 427–451.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dvorkin, J., Nolen-Hoeksema, R. and Nur, A.
    [1994] The squirt-flow mechanism: macroscopic description. Geophysics, 59, 428–438.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dvorkin, J. and Nur, A.
    [1993] Dynamic poroelasticity: a unified model with the squirt and the Biot mechanisms. Geophysics, 58(4), 524–533.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dvorkin, J., Mavko, G. and Nur, A.
    [1995] Squirt flow in fully saturated rocks. Geophysics, 60(1), 97–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mavko, G. and Jizba, D.
    [1991] Estimating grain-scale fluid effects on velocity dispersion in rocks. Geophysics, 56(12), 1940–1949.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mavko, G. and Nur, A.
    [1975] Melt squirt in the asthenosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research, 80(11), 1444–1448.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Müller, T.M. and Gurevich, B.
    [2004] One-dimensional random patchy saturation model for velocity and attenuation in porous rocks. Geophysics, 69(5), 1166–1172.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601391
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601391
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error