1887

Abstract

Summary

The applicability of a deblending method is directly related to acquisition parameters, such as source and detector locations. We formulate focal deblending in two alternative ways. In the first case, the double focal transform is used, which relies on a well-sampled source and detector dimension. In the second case, the single-sided focal transform is used, which does not depend on a well-sampled source dimension. Comparing the deblending results, we find that although the double focal transform is superior, blending noise can be significantly attenuated using the single-sided focal transform, which allows application to more practical acquisition geometries. By combining with shot repetition, the deblending result can be further improved.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601411
2016-05-30
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ayeni, G., Almomin, A. and Nichols, D.
    [2011] On the separation of simultaneous source-data by inversion. 81st SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 20–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. van den Berg, E. and Friedlander, M.P.
    [2007] SPGL1: A solver for large-scale sparse reconstruction. Http://www.cs.ubc.ca/labs/scl/spgl1.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2008] Probing the Pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(2), 890–912.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berkhout, A.J.
    [1982] Seismic migration, imaging of acoustic energy by wave field extrapolation, A: Theoretical aspects. Elsevier (second edition).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [2008] Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition. The Leading Edge, 27(7), 924–938.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Berkhout, A.J. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2006] Focal transformation, an imaging concept for signal restoration and noise removal. Geophysics, 71(6), A55–A59.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. [2010] Parameterization of seismic data using gridpoint responses. 80th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3344–3348.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Y.
    [2015] Deblending by iterative orthogonalization and seislet thresholding. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 53–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, J. and Sacchi, M.D.
    [2015] A fast rank-reduction algorithm for 3D deblending via randomized QR decomposition. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3830–3835.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gan, S., Wang, S., Chen, X. and Chen, Y.
    [2015] Deblending using a structural-oriented median filter. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 59–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Haacke, R., Hampson, G. and Golebiowski, B.
    [2015] Simultaneous shooting for sparse OBN 4D surveys and deblending using modified Radon operators. 77st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We N101 08.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Huo, S., Luo, Y. and Kelamis, P.G.
    [2012] Simultaneous sources separation via multidirectional vector-median filtering. Geophysics, 77(4), V123–V131.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ibrahim, A. and Sacchi, M.D.
    [2013] Simultaneous source separation using a robust Radon transform. Geophysics, 79(1), V1–V11.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kabir, M.M.N. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [1995] Restoration of missing offsets by parabolic Radon transform. Geophysical Prospecting, 43(3), 347–368.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kontakis, A. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2014] Deblending via sparsity-constrained inversion in the focal domain. 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Th ELI2 02.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. [2015] Deblending via a hybrid focal and linear Radon transform. 77th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We N101 02.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kutscha, H. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2012] Data reconstruction via sparse double focal transformation: An overview. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 29(4), 53–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kutscha, H., Verschuur, D.J. and Berkhout, A.J.
    [2010] High resolution double focal transformation and its application to data reconstruction. 80th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3589–3593.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin, T.T.Y. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2009] Designing simultaneous acquisitions with compressive sensing. 71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, S006.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mahdad, A., Doulgeris, P. and Blacquière, G.
    [2011] Separation of blended data by iterative estimation and subtraction of blending interference noise. Geophysics, 76(3), Q9–Q17.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wason, H., Herrmann, F.J. and Lin, T.T.Y.
    [2011] Sparsity-promoting recovery from simultaneous data: a com-pressive sensing approach. 81st SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 6–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wason, H., Kumar, R., Herrmann, F.J. and Aravkin, A.Y.
    [2014] Source separation via SVD-free rank minimization in the hierarchical semi-separable representation. 84th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 120–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu, S., Blacquière, G., and van Groenestijn, G.J.
    [2015] Shot repetition: an alternative approach to blending in marine seismic. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 120–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhan, C., Malik, R., Specht, J., Liu, Z. and Teixeira, D.
    [2015] Deblending of continuously recorded OBN data by subtraction integrated with a median filter. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 4673–4677.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601411
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601411
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error