1887

Abstract

Summary

The slowing of compressional-wave velocity (Vp) with increasing pore pressure has been used for overpressure detection in shales for many years, however, the success of which is highly dependent on the mineralogy, depth of burial, and the history of diagenesis of the shales. In the case of ‘hot’ shales, such as those >100oC, important additional mechanisms unrelated to change in confining stress may be occur such as (a) aquathermal fluid expansion; (b) hydrocarbon source maturation and fluid expulsion and, (c) clay diagenesis such as, smectite to illite conversion ( ). In these particular cases the compressional-wave velocity will not uniquely indicate the pore pressure. There are techniques that exist that help predict the pore pressure where these addition mechanisms are active (e.g. ). However, these relationships use Vp as an input, which slows when gas is present, regardless of the overpressure regime. We propose to highlight this ambiguity of compressional-wave velocity data for pore pressure prediction in this situation, and seek to improve the reliability of overpressure detection in high pressure and high temperature (HP/HT) settings by using shear-wave velocity (Vs) data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601461
2016-05-30
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakulin, A., Kets, F., Hauser, M., Vines, R. and Wieseneck, J.
    [2008] Influence of horizontal and vertical stresses on Vp-Vs trends. Society of Exploration Geophysicists Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowers, G.L.
    [1995] Pore pressure estimated from velocity data: accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides undercompaction. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 89–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dutta, N.C.
    [2002] Deepwater geohazard prediction using prestack inversion of large offset P-wave data and rock model. The Leading Edge, 21, 193–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Swarbrick, R.E., Osborne, M.J. and Yardley, G.S.
    [2002] Comparison of overpressure magnitude resulting from the main generating mechanisms, In: Huffman, A.R. and Bowers, G.L. (Eds) Pressure regimes in sedimentary basins and their prediction. AAPG Memoir, 76, 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Swarbrick, R.
    [2012] Review of pore-pressure prediction challenges in high-temperature areas. The Leading Edge, 31, 1288–1294.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, J. and Wieseneck, J.
    [2011] Challenges and surprises of abnormal pore pressures in shale gas formations. Society of Petroleum Engineers 145964.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601461
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601461
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error