1887

Abstract

Summary

We show that joint total variation can be efficiently used for simultaneous joint inversion of any number of geophysical methods, each sensitive to a different physical parameter of the subsurface. Joint total variation both provides structural coupling between different parameter domains and serves as a stabilizing functional in each domain, simplifying the objective function. Iteratively reweighted least squares scheme with Levenberg-Marquardt method results in decoupled linear systems for different domains, making computational complexity of joint inversion linear with respect to the number of domains and simplifying its software implementation. This approach is applied to 2-D joint inversion of MT impedance, seismic first-arrival traveltime and vertical component of gravitational field and its gradient. Results of the numerical experiment with synthetic data show efficiency of the approach and improvement of the inversion results over the single-domain inversions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601657
2016-05-30
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aster, R.C., Borchers, B., and Thurber, C.H.
    [2013] Parameter estimation and Inverse problems.Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Colombo, D. and De Stefano, M.
    [2007] Geophysical modeling via simultaneous joint inversion of seismic, gravity, and electromagnetic data: Application to prestack depth imaging. The Leading Edge, 26(3), pp. 326–331.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallardo, L.A.
    [2007] Multiple cross-gradient joint inversion for geospectral imaging. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(19).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Habashy, T.M. and Abubakar, A.
    [2004] A general framework for constraint minimization for the inversion of electromagnetic measurements. Progress in electromagnetics Research, 46, pp. 265–312.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Haber, E., and Gazit, M. H.
    [2013] Model fusion and joint inversion. Surveys in Geophysics, 34(5), 675–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heincke, B., Jegen, M. and Hobbs, R.
    [2006] Joint inversion of MT, gravity and seismic data applied to sub-basalt imaging. In SEG Exp anded Abstracts (pp. 784–789). SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Malyshev, N.A., Nikishin, V.A., Nikishin, A.M., Obmetko, V.V., Martirosyan, V.N., Kleshchina, L.N. and Reydik, Y.V.
    [2012] A new model of the geological structure and evolution of the North Kara Sedimentary Basin. Doklady Earth Sciences, Vol. 445, No. 1, pp. 791–795.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Moorkamp, M., Roberts, A.W., Jegen, M., Heincke, B. and Hobbs, R.W.
    [2013] Verification of velocity-resistivity relationships derived from structural joint inversion with borehole data. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(14), pp. 3596–3601.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rodi, W.L.
    [1976] A technique for improving the accuracy of FE solutions for MT data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 44, 483–506.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Vsemirnova, E.A., and Roslov, Yu.V.
    [2004] Raytracing on irregular mesh. V International Conference “Problems of Geocosmos”, Book of abstracts, p. 68.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wannamaker, P.E., Stodt, J.A., and Rijo, L.A.
    [1987] Stable finite element solution for two-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 88(1), 277–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhdanov, M.S., Gribenko, A. and Wilson, G.
    [2012] Generalized joint inversion of multimodal geophysical data using Gramian constraints. Geophysical Research Letters39(9), L09301.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601657
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601657
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error