1887
Volume 65 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Three‐dimensional seismic survey design should provide an acquisition geometry that enables imaging and amplitude‐versus‐offset applications of target reflectors with sufficient data quality under given economical and operational constraints. However, in land or shallow‐water environments, surface waves are often dominant in the seismic data. The effectiveness of surface‐wave separation or attenuation significantly affects the quality of the final result. Therefore, the need for surface‐wave attenuation imposes additional constraints on the acquisition geometry. Recently, we have proposed a method for surface‐wave attenuation that can better deal with aliased seismic data than classic methods such as slowness/velocity‐based filtering. Here, we investigate how surface‐wave attenuation affects the selection of survey parameters and the resulting data quality. To quantify the latter, we introduce a measure that represents the estimated signal‐to‐noise ratio between the desired subsurface signal and the surface waves that are deemed to be noise. In a case study, we applied surface‐wave attenuation and signal‐to‐noise ratio estimation to several data sets with different survey parameters. The spatial sampling intervals of the basic subset are the survey parameters that affect the performance of surface‐wave attenuation methods the most. Finer spatial sampling will reduce aliasing and make surface‐wave attenuation easier, resulting in better data quality until no further improvement is obtained. We observed this behaviour as a main trend that levels off at increasingly denser sampling. With our method, this trend curve lies at a considerably higher signal‐to‐noise ratio than with a classic filtering method. This means that we can obtain a much better data quality for given survey effort or the same data quality as with a conventional method at a lower cost.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12370
2016-03-22
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BerkhoutA.J.1982. Seismic Migration: Imaging of Acoustic Energy by Wavefield Extrapolation, Part A: Theoretical Aspects. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BerkhoutA.J., OngkiehongL., VolkerA.W.F. and BlacquièreG.2001. Comprehensive assessment of seismic acquisition geometries by focal beams – Part I: Theoretical considerations. Geophysics66, 911–917.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BerteussenK., ZhangZ. and SunY.2011. Surface wave analysis of Arabian Gulf ocean bottom seismic data. 73rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  4. CordsenA., GalbraithM. and PeirceJ.2000. Planning Land 3‐D Seismic Surveys . Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  5. GalbraithM.2004. A new methodology for 3D survey design. The Leading Edge23(10), 1017–1023.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. IshiyamaT. and BlacquièreG.2015. 3‐D shallow‐water seismic survey design and evaluation using the focal‐beam method: A case study offshore Abu Dhabi. Geophysical Prospecting, Accepted and published online.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. IshiyamaT., BlacquièreG., VerschuurD.J. and MulderW.A.2015. 3‐D surface‐wave estimation and separation using a closed‐loop approach. Geophysical Prospecting, Accepted and published online.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ThomasR., WhiteR. and CastoroA.1998. Quantitative controls on 3‐D seismic processing for prestack attribute analysis. The Leading Edge17(11), 1596–1599.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. van VeldhuizenE.J., BlacquièreG. and BerkhoutA.J.2008. Acquisition geometry analysis in complex 3D media. Geophysics73, Q43–Q58.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. VermeerG.J.O.2012. 3‐D Seismic Survey Design . Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  11. VolkerA.W.F., BlacquièreG., BerkhoutA.J. and OngkiehongL.2001. Comprehensive assessment of seismic acquisition geometries by focal beams – Part II: Practical aspects and examples. Geophysics66, 918–931.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. YilmazO.2001. Seismic Data Analysis . Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12370
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12370
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error